Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
but map selection is based on province, not army placement
so you can have a bridge fight near the northwest of the darklands while nowhere near a bridge
maybe even as far back as shogun2 being the last one
they claim that maps would be too boring when done like that, preferring the custom made maps
it is sad that its no longer a thing, it would ad some depth to an otherwise pretty irrelevant campaign map
Oh, I'm not sure about "bridges" specifically, but in WH2 if your army is parked next to a bridge on the campaign map, their battle map will be some sort of choke point.
Attila. 3K might have had them too.
It was dropped with warhammer 1 in favor of premade stuff. And that was and still is a terrible decision. Generating battlemaps from the campaign-terrain was the entire point of the 3D campaign-map in the first place when it launch with rome1, not just look pretty, having some premade maps just devalues the whole thing.
?
Making maps is what they are doing now so I dont know what you are getting at. Auto-generated terrain like we used to have in the past would have included various steps of corruption just as it used to include slightly different placements & seasons.