Mod to make IE world run smoother?

[500KG]

Battles are fine, but the performance in the overworld (for me) is super laggy and makes the FPS fluctuate between 40 - 60, i'm running everything on Medium.

[Captain Worthy]

Pretty much the only way to have decent frames on the map at 1440p or 4k, is to upscale the resolution from 1080p.

I'm running it at ultra settings upscaled to 4k from 1080p and get well above 60fps on the IE map, and much more in battles. It looks much worse than native 4k but depth of field setting hides a lot of the mess.

If you are running it at native 1080p already, then of course you'd have to upscale it from 720p.

I've got an RX 6800 OC edition, Ryzen 5600X and 32GB of 3600Mhz RAM and have the game installed on a fast M.2 Nvme SSD and the campaign map probably burdens my system more than Cyberpunk 2077 would with ray tracing enabled. It's horribly unoptimized and TW:WH3 desperately needs FSR/DLSS support due to this.

[Lady MacBeth]

I will have to disagree with Captain above when it comes to 1440p. I am running the game at 1440p ultra (well almost, the tsaa is terrible looking, so running fxaa instead) and for the most part get 60fps on the IE campaign map. Only dropping somewhat when panning around when most the map is revealed.
3600x paired with a 3070, typical midrange system, 3200mhz 16gb, and a fairly fast m.2 nvme ssd at 5,000mbs. So not the fastest out there, but way faster then my sata ssds were.

[Captain Worthy]

Originally posted by Ming:

I will have to disagree with Captain above when it comes to 1440p. I am running the game at 1440p ultra (well almost, the tsaa is terrible looking, so running fxaa instead) and for the most part get 60fps on the IE campaign map. Only dropping somewhat when panning around when most the map is revealed.
3600x paired with a 3070, typical midrange system, 3200mhz 16gb, and a fairly fast m.2 nvme ssd at 5,000mbs. So not the fastest out there, but way faster then my sata ssds were.

Yes of course, it comes down to personal taste which kinds of framerates one feels are decent or not. You don't get those dips below 60 fps if you upscale from 1080p though, and another advantage is the game draws less power this way too than when you run it at native resolution.

[korvin479]

less fog of war on the map = less fps. so if someone makes a visibility limiting mod it might help

[pascal.difolco]

Originally posted by Ming:

I will have to disagree with Captain above when it comes to 1440p. I am running the game at 1440p ultra (well almost, the tsaa is terrible looking, so running fxaa instead) and for the most part get 60fps on the IE campaign map. Only dropping somewhat when panning around when most the map is revealed.
3600x paired with a 3070, typical midrange system, 3200mhz 16gb, and a fairly fast m.2 nvme ssd at 5,000mbs. So not the fastest out there, but way faster then my sata ssds were.

Same for me with a 5900X/3080 on Ultrawide 1440p, mix of Ultra/High and FXAA, around 60fps in campaign, dips to 50ish but on campaign map it isn't really an issue