Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Obviously the ai plays worse than player, but I've gone up vs say a stack of saurus with a similar army and they don't win by much. I think white lions trade around even with saurus, and chosen put them in the dirt.
Cathay is also one of the worst MP factions, which seems hard to imagine if they had infantry performing at near double their cost.
What is making you think jade warriors win vs white lions? I'd like to see that myself.
So when fighting against Cathay it's rather simple: shoot their nearest missile troops to pieces and the buffs disappear as well.
And then yade warriors are just basic shielded infantry troops any decent specialized infantry or monster kills easily.
And really, don't use white lions unless for few niche cases
Not so bad in land battles though
Swordsmen (Empire): 400 gold / average stats / 30 armor
Jade Warriors (Cathay): 500 gold / average stats / 80 armor
I suppose when Cathay will receive a DLC to make them more potent, they will balance out the unit. Right now, the faction is performing so poorly (not talking campaign of course) that they won't nerf them.
But, yeah, for 500g, jade warriors overperform by quite a margin.
They're not, go watch some actual competitive matches, there was a tournament recently, Cathay is weak.
Your example is outright false. Based on their stats alone the White Lions of Chrace are superior to Jade Warriors in melee, unless you buffed up your warriors somehow.
I'm gonna test this out in fact.
If you look at the 2 units, even if we assume 100% multiplier on harmony, the jade warrior has less armor (90 vs 80), less weapon strength (about the same accounting for the fact they have more models), non ap, similar leadership, 8 less melee attack but 8 more md, less charge, and about 10% more hp (white lions are also 20% faster but that doesn't affect who wins 1v1).
Based on those numbers, they're pretty similar, but white lion is ap and jade warrior isn't. Therefore, the jade warrior would obviously lose. Remember that's assuming 100% harmony multiplier, their stats aren't even close without it.
I tried it out in a custom battle (though that was vs ai so its not perfectly ideal) If you combine that with miao ying and her -8 melee attack buff, its about even.
With a lord magistrate (not using buffs), which is still 50% harmony amplifier so its still pretty decent conditions for the jade warriors, the white lions win with a bit under half their hp left. They do hold out for a long period of time.
So again, I do not believe you at all. The jade warriors do not win without stacking buffs on them (such as by having miao ying nearby for her 100% harmony and -8 melee attack debuff).
You could potentially still consider that overperforming (though I'd be equally inclined to say white lions underperform), but they definitely lose.
A land battle tournament or domination tournament?
Last matches I've seen them in, even in domination, they did fine and won. It was pure infantry swarm, both ranged and melee in attrition and holding points.
Yeah although that's a maybe, who knows where the game will be once they get a DLC. Plenty of things could change by then.
Maybe they don't overperform that much as I'm saying and it's the Empire infantry that underperforms.
We shall see in due time.