UPDATED PVP TIERLIST

[Dusty!]

https://totaltavern.com/factionstatistics

>S++++
Slaanesh

>S
Vampire counts

>A Meta(65%)
Tomb kings, Warriors of chaos

>B(55%)
Nurgle, Ogres, Dark elves, Norscans

>C (playable) (45%)
Khorne Tzeentch, Dwarvs, wood elves, Skaven, Beastmen, greenskins

>D (35%)
Cathay, Kislev, Bretons, Vampire coast, high elves, demons, Lizardmen

>F
Empire

[Strifeboy]

Is there an IE tier list?

[Dusty!]

Messaggio originale di Strifeboy:

Is there an IE tier list?

Well IE legendary can be played with all factions if you are willing to manually cheese every battle, spending 8 hours on you first 30 turns.

Otherwise difficulty would favor stuff like the brass bull and khorne, the easiest factions, and oppose the harder factions, like empire, high elves.

To that extent, i'd say the best tierlist for IE would be how kino the faction is vs how many seperate DLC you need to max the faction out. The kino/DLC price ratio.

The best factions, to that extent, would be tomb kings and vampire counts by far, being super powerful and diverse with only a few DLC/games required.

The worst factions for kino/dlc price ratio would be greenskins, empire, chaos, high elves, wood elves, lizardmen, skaven

[Dusty!]

Messaggio originale di The Sand Witch:

What about skill level of players involved in the tournaments?

Seems like corrupted data presented as "pvp tierlist" which I'm sure totaltavern did not ever claim.

Entry level tourny players play the races better than quick battles players.

[Imposter]

Nah, I dont believe Slaanesh is anywhere near Khorne. I'd put Nurgle over Slaanesh.

[MrSoul]

I'm still confused by these stats.
So what league are these based on? Seems from front page of the site there are many different leagues of play including this:
https://totaltavern.com/tournament/96

Which has stipulations for playing like have to always be on the offensive. These little things can hugely skew stats like this if they're being included in those results. Also appears to be mixing land and domination battles, like looks like really fun website but wouldn't exactly call these definitive for anything meta wise.

[Dusty!]

Messaggio originale di Blasted:

Nah, I dont believe Slaanesh is anywhere near Khorne. I'd put Nurgle over Slaanesh.

Khorne doesn't have spellcasting and i'm pretty sure they have no good way to deal with flying units. Like they'll draft some harpies and you do a sidewinder by spellcasting against them, then you can field those armor piercing crossbow flying units against them.

Their units are good but extremely predictable.

Slaanesh has chariots and heavy infantry with devastating flanker, so there's no reason they don't draft ultra wide every game, and then they have OP lords and spellcasting as well.