Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
It's very much a fair point to remember that while their factions are representative of their patron gods, the legendary lords for the chaos factions are independent individuals who have their own plans and goals beyond just serving their respective god in the great game.
I disagree heartily, in fact I think the opposite. Having a variety of different races to fight against is inherently more fun than just one, and this matters on every single play through. The factions around you provide either your first enemies or your first allies/trading partners and if they all have the same attitudes towards you the campaign is less interesting. Think Ulthuan in TWW2 -- it's fun maybe once or twice to play as an elf there and unite the other elves, but you rarely have any threats and ultimately it's the same every time. Not so if you're playing as the empire, you never know what's going to happen there because there are so many races fighting over that area.
Further, having a variety of enemies also ensures you have reasons to use different tactics and units in your armies. Not always, of course. But some units are inherently better against certain factions and an army tailored to fight dwarfs isn't necessarily going to be ideal for fighting Khorne or Slaanesh.
So, no, it has nothing to do with novelty factor, it has to do with campaign variety. And it becomes MORE important on 2nd or 3rd playthoughs.
WHFB numbers dwindled through the 90s and kinda fell off hard after that. I think when the killed it off, 40k had like 9 times the number of players as WHFB?
Very few Daemons serve their respective Dark God willingly, anyway. They would kill and consume them, if it was possible, and almost everyone of them wants to break free and become a God in their own right.
The Realm of Chaos Campaign takes place before Warhammer I and II so the events of the Vortex have no bearing on Warhammer 3. I'm not sure what order Warhammer I and II take place in after three, just that they both take place after three. I remember reading somewhere at the time that Warhammer 2's Vortex campaign is happening at the same time as the Warhammer 1 campaign, since the Vortex is entirely divorced from the events in the Old World.
They're on the TWW3 map due to being part of the campaign mechanic. No campaign mechanic, no reason to add them.
Is this a set up or something? I think he was just trying to get to the beach, he didn't even finish his cookie
(Whoever gets this wins an award)
When they are created by being separated from the greater entity (the god) more powerful deamons (So especially greater deamons) do develop a mind of their own.
Many of them (and the once mortal deamon princes) hate being enslaved to the greater god :P
I mean Skarbrand that tried to sneak attack Khorne is the perfect example (the reason he was exiled).
But i'm not sure if "very few serve willingly" is correct.
they can hate it as much as your liver cells hate you, wich no matter how much you drink, doesnt matter
them developing a mind of their own sounds relevant if you look at the gods imagining a mortal mind, but they are gods
gods of the warp even, so the comparison is ludicrous
and the division irrelevant
they are their god, especially the unique parts, the self hating parts and the exiled parts
And because of that, each one see themselves as the one true fragment that should be an actual God.
Chaos Daemons are not humble or servile, by nature.
Them still being part of their god becomes irrelevant if they don't have to listen to said god and can even backstab said god.
They are not necessarily going on a mission of their greater god at all times either. They have schemes of their own. They are somewhat independent and given some freedom.
We have two excellent examples of them being independent actors in the games current Legendary lords (that i know of):
We have Skarsbrand that quite literally backstabbed Khorne and was exiled because of it.
We have Ku'gath Plaguefather that accidentally absorbed one of Nurgles new plagues when he was a mere nergling, Nurgle was happy since this resulted in him getting a interesting new Exalted Unclean one, but Ku'gath was so depressed about having ruined the new plague that he became the plaguefather trying to recreate a plague just as good (on his own accord).
because if you want to get backstabbed you cant get backstabbed, its just your plan happening
skarbrabd didnt backstab khorne, tzeensh did
again looking at a gods plans like a mortals
no their parts missions are their missions thats why a part of them wants it and is doing it
wich exactly proves my point
yes nurgle is a nice friendly grandpa wich will forgive anything his kids will break
but somewhere deep inside he still lost one of his projects, his work was lost
as much as he denies it he was sad about it, the silver lining doesnt remove the cloud
kugath is that part, the only great unclean one whos not jolly all the time
just because nurgle didnt tell him to doesnt make that desire less a part of nurgle
"IS TOTAL WAR: WARHAMMER III GOING TO BE SET DURING THE END TIMES AND FEATURE STUFF FROM AGE OF SIGMAR?
No, as with Total War: WARHAMMER and Total War: WARHAMMER II, Total War: WARHAMMER III is set around the reign of Karl Franz. Our primary source is Warhammer Fantasy Battles 8th Edition, although we have and will continue to use older editions for inspiration where appropriate."
It states warhammer 1-3 are all set around Karl Franz reign.
Where did you read other wise?