安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Sigvald is an average lord fighting with some decent contenders early, he has a little challenge. That would be my take
That means there comes a point where you can't maintain Slaaneshi corruption in your regions because your buildings all generate undivided corruption. He also uses the undivided tech tree.
The others aren't half bad though. But the WoC mechanics kit mixed with some Slaanesh monogod kit, while interesting, provide less synergies than the full fledged Slaanesh monogod kit.
Also if playing on IE, starting in Ulthuan is so, so thematic for N'Kari.
Through research you can spread slaaneshi corruption when using slaaneshi gifts so that fixes it.
But, yeah, I did not like it too much neither. Not a big fan of dorian gray and even less so that N'Kari is mad badass and slaaneshi demons are quite neat, too.
Yeah I was leaning towards N'kari as well, although Azazel is quite nice as well.. Really love that he's a small (non-large) model, but N'kari is quite awesome, although made of glass :D
One other thing that's quite alluring about Azazel is the inclusion of chaos cannons though.
"Come to me children... Or I shall blast you to pieces!"
If you do that on the regular warriors of chaos, obviously chaos knights can rear charge too but they just don't have that insane instant routing damage vs armored units that seekers and heartseekers have.
Also you don't get a real damage dealing infantry on the warriors of chaos roster cause slaanesh don't have an armor piercing option for their chosen (nor do they have the insane weapon strength and ma of khorne chosen), unless you just use the undivided ones of course. Exalted daemonettes open that option up.
The warriors of chaos roster on the other hand would give them options that lend themselves to playing less like slaanesh. Hellcannons, trolls, giants, and undivided units in general all lend themselves more to slower direct melee fights rather than the flanking instant routes slaanesh does so well.
However, I think I have a noticable bias in that I don't particularly like azazel. I think he's boring. And while I like sigvald, he's undivided, which could be interesting for something like combining slaanesh and nurgle but for pure slaanesh I wouldn't pick him.
The healing of Festus, able to fight much stronger armies and come out nearly unscaved is kinda OP but hillarious..
If you know how to play him, i think Festus is the strongest of all Chaos warriors.
I had fun because I usually don't bother with vassals and Norscans as faction is too weak to actually benefit from as Chaos Overlord. However Cathay and Miau as their leader is a seriously good vassal to be played around with. She slaps hard. Miau has fallen to the dark side
Absolutely agree..
He's one of the strongest lords in the game due to his insane aoe healing (and increased cap) and empowered mortis engine effect.
Good point.
I mostly play multiplayer vs others, but there N'kari of course doesn't have his campaign buffs etc.
Or do N'kari also have very strong capitals, etc, garrison wise?
Edit: Now that I think about it Slaanesh must have a horrible garrison without anything ranged XD