Warhammer 3 has lower quality textures for Old World races

[Velovar]

this is the comparison made by me for second game:
https://www.reddit.com/r/totalwar/comments/m8z66b/warhammer_1_vs_warhammer_2_graphics_comparison/

this is the comparison for new game:
https://forums.totalwar.com/discussion/304374/game-1-textures-in-game-3

[Velovar]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Elitewrecker PT:

2d portholes look better anyway

Im all for games like Disciples 2 and similar 2D games but this is a AAA title with false advertisement, nowhere do they tell you "textures from first game are badly exported/imported aka downgraded".
A lot of people like 3D diplomacy screen and it is something you see every 2 minutes.
NOTE: not only portholes are bad, entire textures have been exported badly for all units, only thing equivalent may be number of polygons they have.

[North Yorkshire Claret]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Groovy baby!:

If we're talking about the faces you see on the campaign map, I don't really mind it. To be honest I'd prefer it if they were smaller and not animated at all. It adds nothing for me to see a character wobbling around all the time.

I prefer they focus on meaningful mechanics for improved gameplay instead of graphics.

There's a great mod for WH2 that adds really improves the 2D portraits - Charming Portholes.

I definently prefer 2D portraits, vanilla or not.

[Sovereign246]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nandi:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Elitewrecker PT:

2d portholes look better anyway

Im all for games like Disciples 2 and similar 2D games but this is a AAA title with false advertisement, nowhere do they tell you "textures from first game are badly exported/imported aka downgraded".
A lot of people like 3D diplomacy screen and it is something you see every 2 minutes.
NOTE: not only portholes are bad, entire textures have been exported badly for all units, only thing equivalent may be number of polygons they have.

Because they are neither the selling point or focus of the game. In fact in none of the marketing has the existence of game 1 or 2 factions even been addressed beyond some blogs related to reworks.

So no it is not false advertising because game 1 races have not featured in any advertising what so ever.

If you want people to take you seriously stop making stuff up. Most people here would be on your side if you were not being a bellend about it.

[Velovar]

@predator246 we are all very aware major selling point is the Mortal Empires campaign/map people who play Old World races buy third game mostly so they can enjoy their game on a larger scale.
EDIT: please lets stay on topic which is THIRD GAME HAS EVEN LOWER TEXTURE QUALITY FOR OLD WORLD RACES
Thank you

[Sovereign246]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nandi:

@predator246 we are all very aware major selling point is the Mortal Empires campaign/map people who play Old World races buy third game mostly so they can enjoy their game on a larger scale.

The combined map wont be in the game at launch.
EDIT: The majority of posts here are on topic. They simply disagree with you or don't see it as an issue.

[an entire Roman legion]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Nandi:

@predator246 we are all very aware major selling point is the Mortal Empires campaign/map people who play Old World races buy third game mostly so they can enjoy their game on a larger scale.
EDIT: please lets stay on topic which is THIRD GAME HAS EVEN LOWER TEXTURE QUALITY FOR OLD WORLD RACES
Thank you

you're right. have fun!

[NixAhmose]

Didn’t you already make this topic in the WH2 discussion board and everyone proved you wrong?

[Mazisky]

Empire, Dwarfs and other old races are part of the Wathammer 3 game, they are present in the map and you foght against them.
They should be on the same graphic quality of new races because they are Warhammer 3 content.

[Velovar]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mazisky:

Empire, Dwarfs and other old races are part of the Wathammer 3 game, they are present in the map and you foght against them.
They should be on the same graphic quality of new races because they are Warhammer 3 content.

Yeah btw I got these 3 guys above you blocked, they just keep following and trying to trigger so no use in talking with them.

[chickabumpbump]

Can you block me so I dont have to see your inane, whiny threads by someone who doesnt know anything about game development complaining about minor issues?

[A shell of light]

Block doesn't work that way honey, you would actually have to make a "minor effort" to block the thread maker in order to avoid seeing these "minor issues".

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย chickabumpbump:

Can you block me so I dont have to see your inane, whiny threads by someone who doesnt know anything about game development complaining about minor issues?

[Mazisky]

I do not know what is wrong with fair criticism.

It is a good thing to point out problematic of the game, even if minor, because there is a bigger chance of them being fixed with the benefit for all the players.

[NixAhmose]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mazisky:

Empire, Dwarfs and other old races are part of the Wathammer 3 game, they are present in the map and you foght against them.
They should be on the same graphic quality of new races because they are Warhammer 3 content.

Should they? Yes.

Is it a major game-breaking issue that they aren't? No.

[Mactalon]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mazisky:

I do not know what is wrong with fair criticism.

It is a good thing to point out problematic of the game, even if minor, because there is a bigger chance of them being fixed with the benefit for all the players.

There's nothing wrong with fair criticism, the difference here is that someone is attempting to present their own opinion as factual evidence, and there's been multiple threads demonstrating in detail why their points are either inaccurate or completely fabricated.

There are plenty of valid criticisms to level at the game, making things up or misrepresenting them are generally considered unwelcome/likely attempts at trolling. Considering the spamming the OP is doing of threads on the exact same topic, the number of times it's been disproved, and his immediately accusing everyone who disagrees with him of being toxic - all evidence points to them deliberately attempting to be a disruptive element.

Nobody minds criticism, people do get weary of attention-seekers though.

[Ysthrall]

Oh, you replicated the thread that got blocked with the same complaints.

(looks at links, details, piccies and comparisms)

That's not enough of a change to be bothered about.