安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Their real issue is their speed, they are SLOW, but they are great warriors, hell, they are all chosen of chaos so Khorne doesn't really have a T1, their base infantry is like T4 at least.
Bloodletters are very fast killing machines and I prefer to use them. Just rush the enemy and destroy everything ! A mix of both could work if you use the bloodletters as flankers but the benefit is really limited over an army full of bloodletters. In some battles, your chaos warriors will barely be useful while trying to catch other units.
Chaos warriors are potentially good in sieges because they can tank towers a bit better but they are soooo slow, it's painful to move them through the city. It's much better to just have bloodletters along with some flying units whose role will be to destroy some towers.
But yes, chaos warriors are slow as hell. So while they can tank some tower shots (probably, shield only works against small projectiles and I am not sure if tower projectiles count as small) it is much better to just get to the supply point faster and make the tower disappear using blood letters.
A straight up comparison is not favorable to Bloodletters. The Warriors, on paper, should defeat them all day, It's easy to miss that Frenzy, but here it pushes the match decisively in the Chaos Warriors' favor.
Bloodletters have less hp, same figures, and some preliminary calculations show that due to the armor and hit chance, they'll do less damage than the warriors to their counterpart, and they're more expensive, too
This bears out in actual gameplay, too.
But, for siege battles in particular, which we now have a lot of, speed is absolutely a factor, and the Chaos Warriors are some of the slowest infantry in game, only beating out nurgle troops... I think? Still, they're about 75% as fast as the Bloodletters. That's a real difference, but it's not halved or anything.
And then we have
The hellblade is mostly irrelevant for this comparison; it won't trigger before a duel is decided, but it is worth keeping in mind. Flaming is good against regenerating and healing magic. Same with the magic damage, but it increases their utility against a lot of other targets. Still, Exalteds have much better MAtt and MDef than their earlier counterparts. Combined with the higher damage, that's a decisive change in balance. But the change in cost and recruitment time is also considerable.
Just adding numbers and a quick analysis for some more 'meat' to the discussion. :)
So.... yeah. I think the chaos warriros are still good,against, say, marauders and such, where their armor comes into play more, but I don't think I'll think of them as stronger than bloodletters anymore.
Chaos Warriors are anti infantry
Aye Warriors are fantastic for autoresolve