安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
and seriously where did you see democratia in warhammer? hello Louen king of bretonnia the peasant made a strike with labor union and want a free election, they dont want to be in first line in battle and dont want to work in fields, they want dwarves machine for their field, own their land, dont pay taxes and want nobless to pay theirs.
louen: hold my grail its civil war !!!
TL:DR NO
Honestly, a horrible idea... as Civilization 6 mods were ban hammer happy when people were calling out their white knighting of banning people and deleting threads for bashing the games art style... basically pulling an american democrat esque hypocrisy, as the white knight fanbois were calling people derogatory words, and not getting banned for it, yet people were banned for calling THEM "idiots" "tools," "losers," etc. I personally got banned for calling out this one guy, using the letters "BS" in my post, who IN MY QUOTE OF HIM, was calling OTHER people insults(including horse's *).. I argued with the mod(think his name was hobbes or some *) and basically said it was his discretion to ban people for using insulting language or attempting to bypass language filter(AKA HIS BIAS).
So, I re-posted the comment after the 48hr ban, removing the "offensive language" of "BS" and the only thing I added was "since SOMEONE thought it was offensive, i'll reiterate" and then the same mod banned me again citing the rule about "not discussing moderation" or whatever. Granted, these were temp. bans, but my point of bias and over reaching mods stands...
The other guy had maybe 3-4 posts per a page on this one thread regarding the cartoon art style, for at least the first 30 pages, just doing nothing but calling out critics of the graphics "ignorant little girls" and using asterisks to blot out blatant swearing, and other contrived insults. The game tanked upon release from 160k users to 20k in under 5 weeks, so the dude vanished for a month, changed his name to thunder ninja or something, realizing he was now a pariah, as no amount of white knight pedestal praising was gonna save the game.
So no... a"ban hammer/cancel culture" approach is NOT the answer. Kind of sick of people exaggerating the phrase "toxic" and suggesting its "worse here than it is over there." There's plenty of people who believe themselves to be pragmatists, who get away with just as much toxic behavior, simply because they're defending the game/candidate/product on a forum/medium designated to them, instead of "attacking" it. Kind of tired of people just pushing to censor people, and its been a growing trend for at least 4 years now(wonder what THAT correlation could be).
To be clear, I can't wait for TW3 and I have logged probably 1300 hours in TW and 600 in TW2, and I enjoy Civ 6, but I only got my thousand hours into it AFTER the developer made mod came out toning down the saturation, and changing the textures to more akin to Civ 5. You wait 7 years for a game, you want it to live up to your expectations, and clearly millions of other players felt the same way and the mods over there were trying their damn-dest to squelch it. The game has 1960s BATMAN "pow" decals for attacks FFS!!
The "warhammer-fanbase" isn't the one causing most of the toxicity here.
Its either butthurt historical purists that somehow failed to read the numerous statements by CA that Warhammer was planned as a Trilogy from the start and are angry about CA continuing their by far most successfull Series instead of making "insert sequel to historical Total War here", also failing to realise that the Fantasy & historical-Games are done by two different teams and don't cause delays to each other.
And the load of People preaching how everybody that buys the game is stupid because "insert reason", even though 90% of them have never touched or seen a Total War-Game before, they just saw a Preorder being high on the list of most-bought titles and decided to be annoying.
And mixed in are some people who just want to make people upset because bored.
Fun fact, if didn't know historically, in the real world, Warcraft 1 is actually based on Warhammer. Blizzard had license all the waaaaay back then to make a Warhammer game, but upon quality assesment by GamesWorkshop(company which owns IP of Warhammer/invented it), they pulled the license and Blizzard just went on to release Warcraft as their own game. Think GW basically said something effect what Blizzard had made did not visually represent the IP of warhammer, ie taken too many artistic liberties with source material. Oh same basically true of Star Craft as well and 40k.
...THE MORE YOU KNOW!!
Then go back to Faceshit or wherever else is your retarded safespace/echo chamber snowflake.
Ye, let's ban people from store front is, cause they hurt my feelings. People like you shouldn't be allowed on the internet with normal people. Or you should be on some safe space version of it, so we won't have to endure your stupidity.
Yeah think about ten or so years ago one of the Blizzard ceo's finally confirmed truth to the long long rumoured tales and, well, I mean some pretty damn obvious parralels in certain basic ways lead to many people just assuming as well. Luckily imo thats where it ends and why I just say its only really true for WC1 and maybe SC1 in conception cycle of development, which could of just as easily been inspired by novels like Star Ship Troopers going back to 50's or Armor in the 80s. And like to say Warhammer itself is wholly original?
Yeah certain British author, and a lot of human mythology/folk tales/theatre plays/classic literature like Fairy Queen disagree with that xD