Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There are many more Easter Eggs like this in the game ;-)
On the bright side it throws their ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ "It's not historically accurate" excuse out the window when making some suggestions for the game.
Yeah I don't want to be all "Forced Representation" but not being able to put same-sex people in a house is lame, as far as mechanics go. A lot of times at a fire there's 2 guys or 2 girls that have the best starting skill levels and I only have one house to use (in the first season of a new save) so I don't care about romance and kids, it just wouldn't be a stretch to have same-sex share a home
That would certainly be a welcomed change, then we just need an orphanage to get added to a town so we can adopt heirs. Not everyone wants to do the whole marriage thing, and it would give a bit more depth to villager sickness / death as well.
Oh and maybe if kids aren't adopted by a certain age they run away and become bandits
That would be twisted seeing this little kid be born and then eventually waddling around town only for their parents to die end up growing up in an orphanage and then years later running into them as a bandit. Hell even more so if they gave the bandits the same mood, etc. system as the other villagers so if you didn't adopt them but a different child they would remember and hold a grudge against you. lol