Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I think I read somewhere that villagers having kids allows you to go over the population cap. 18 years isn't so long given the speed time moves in this game. Keeping the sprogs might be the only reasonable way to get more villagers at this point?
Now I'm in two minds, lol.
Otherwise there's absolutely no reason to have skill-based buildings allow more than 2 employees before you have like 100k dp. I'm sitting at just over 10k dp and can't possibly eat all the food 1 hunter collects (not even a good hunter) and an 8x8 plot of carrots. Once all your houses are built and daubed, the amount of firewood you use drops to ~4-5/hr in winter. I'm dumping stuff on the floor simply because I can't use it and no other villages have any money to buy things.
So this apprentice idea: Maybe the heir could follow us around after a certain age, and have the heir's skills slowly scale to 2/3 our existing skills as they approach 18? This would take the sting out of skilling the slow skills again at least.
The really funny thing is one of the game loading screens shows a father teaching his 3-4 year old son how to use a bow.
As someone else suggested, maybe a disclaimer screen of some sort stating that this is a period based game and is in fact not real life and that youngsters were married and had kids of their own by 13/14 back then. I'm guessing this is a legal thing though and that some..... would be outraged at this and campaign to have the evil game showing child labour and exploitation of women banned.
It wouldn't shock me if people in the game stop working at random intervals so they can take a 'Me day'.
Either way, this topic comes up so often that I hope the devs will explain why it is as it is.
I know, they can't keep their hands off each other. I have to room all the men and women in separate houses.
Damn that stupid bastard can´t be my son.
Is what still the case? Kids not being able to work until 18? Yes, that's still a thing. However, children born in your village no longer count towards your dynasty rep, so now they don't affect your population cap. And the amount of food and firewood they use has always been much lower than adults use, so they're not really a problem.