Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It's not baffling if you actually read why the content was removed in the first place.
As for not allowing a "Choice of installed content" that isn't easily possible as you would have to cater for all parts of the game, then get complaints because people would have to install "Forsaken" say to just do a nightfall etc, it just not viable!
people have a hard time wrapping their head around this for some reason lol
Shadowkeep came before Beyond Light.....
Yes there is a lot of story in the seasons but they're smaller 10$ nuggets of additional content in addition to the more expensive major dlc.
As for DLC packaging, not only they could, they did, because they always had to do it anyway. They'd just need to add few filters for playlist activites and few extra texts (Warning why something is not accessible has been part of game since Y1). That's it. Problem solved. If they wanted...
NF is special case, but fine, you can do temp downlaod of only necessary packages (no need for bulk of voice acting or videos and other irrelevant stuff).
Reposting with hopefully fixed quote tags.
That's incorrect.
The stated reason was that the code was old and sprawling (because of the pace that Activision pushed Bungie to develop at, Activision likes a "build fast, then discard and put out a sequel" pace). The developer tools were obsolete.
It wasn't operationally viable to develop NEW content while also trying to maintain the older content. The older content (regardless of what you believe) was NOT being utilized (at anything even remotely approaching the rate at which newer content was being utilized.
The choice was:
1): Vault the older content and focus on the newer content that the bulk of the player base wanted.
2): Put new development on hold while working on the older content.
Bungie knew it was a choice between evils, but choose the one they thought was the lesser of the two.
If you want the official explanation, that can be found here: https://www.bungie.net/en/Explore/Detail/News/49189
https://help.bungie.net/hc/en-us/articles/360049202971-Destiny-Content-Vault
No, that's really NOT how that works. The problems on the user's end were minor (mostly having to do with the users of the older consoles). The key problems were on the Bungie side of the equation, and would NOT have been solved by your proposal.