Arma 3
How much does RAM affect fps?
How much does RAM affect fps? I have 1 stick of 8gb, would I get a significant increase in performance if I got another stick on 8gb?
< >
Showing 1-15 of 41 comments
Nutlink Apr 6, 2016 @ 11:32pm 
I don't think more RAM would help, but a few years ago someone did some testing and found that RAM speed does make a difference. I never noticed a difference in actual frame rate when I went from 1600 to 2133, but I did notice a severe drop in how often my frame rate would dip. I'm not sure how accurate that would be now though, considering this was quite a while ago and the game has had some signficant changes since then.

https://forums.bistudio.com/topic/156993-arma-3-cpu-vs-ram-performance-comparison-1600-2133-up-to-15-fps-gain/
Maschinengewehr Apr 7, 2016 @ 6:16am 
Not per se, but higher frequency RAM generally runs better. That said, Arma 3 is only 32-bit. So it can only use a maximium 4GB anyway (3.5 GB if you include the OS). More RAM will make no difference whatsoever.

If you want better FPS in Arma 3, get a new CPU or O'C your current CPU. That will yield the greatest return.
Sgt Smash Apr 7, 2016 @ 6:57am 
The game is hard codded to 2gb ram, so aslong you have 2gb for the game and another 2gb for os and background apps you want see a difference!!
Originally posted by Maschinengewehr:
Not per se, but higher frequency RAM generally runs better. That said, Arma 3 is only 32-bit. So it can only use a maximium 4GB anyway (3.5 GB if you include the OS). More RAM will make no difference whatsoever.

If you want better FPS in Arma 3, get a new CPU or O'C your current CPU. That will yield the greatest return.
Okay, I overclocked my ram and gpu by 180mhz. My CPU is always running at 5% when I'm playing the game so I don't know if that'll make a huge difference.

I am running a 4790k@4.0 and I have a gtx 960
Originally posted by Maschinengewehr:
Not per se, but higher frequency RAM generally runs better. That said, Arma 3 is only 32-bit. So it can only use a maximium 4GB anyway (3.5 GB if you include the OS). More RAM will make no difference whatsoever.

If you want better FPS in Arma 3, get a new CPU or O'C your current CPU. That will yield the greatest return.
Okay, I overclocked my ram and gpu by 180mhz. My CPU is always running at 5% when I'm playing the game so I don't know if that'll make a huge difference.

I am running a 4790k@4.0 and I have a gtx 960
Pèpè Silvia Apr 7, 2016 @ 5:17pm 
Originally posted by Sgt Smash:
The game is hard codded to 2gb ram, so aslong you have 2gb for the game and another 2gb for os and background apps you want see a difference!!
This is wrong, it can use up to ~3.5gb
Sgt Smash Apr 7, 2016 @ 6:08pm 
Originally posted by Pèpè Silvia:
Originally posted by Sgt Smash:
The game is hard codded to 2gb ram, so aslong you have 2gb for the game and another 2gb for os and background apps you want see a difference!!
This is wrong, it can use up to ~3.5gb
i was only going on what it says on there wiki page, maybe there wrong.
Dada Apr 7, 2016 @ 9:49pm 
you need a SSD for good performance and the IA react better with a SSD
Dada Apr 7, 2016 @ 9:50pm 
Solid State Drive
Dada Apr 7, 2016 @ 9:52pm 
and use a SATA 3 (6Gb/s) look at your motherboard near the SATA if you see 6Gb/s buy a SSD you can find good one for 100 dollars (Kingston 260 Gb and 450 Mb/s write/read its enough)
JojoTheSlayer Apr 7, 2016 @ 10:22pm 
Originally posted by Gary the Savage Snail:
How much does RAM affect fps? I have 1 stick of 8gb, would I get a significant increase in performance if I got another stick on 8gb?

Zero...
If you have the game on a 7200rpm spin disk you will notice more texture poping compared to a decent SSD and that might indirectly affect fps at times. If you put the whole game on a Ramdisk (use ram to emulate a harddisk), which I did with Arma 2 as a test, you will get less texture popping compared to a SSD, since a ramdisk is like 4 times faster (also why more ram wont matter if it streams from the harddrive btw), but it will not be practical and noticeable differences.

The amount of ram however doesnt matter. Ether you have enough and the game starts or you dont and it does not. Thats it. The game is inherenlty a 32bit application, not 64bit. So in Windows there is a 2gig limit for such programs at any time. The Arma engine at its core is the same as it was back in Operation Flashpoint days.

Biggest fps limiter in Arma is the CPU because of the independent type AI used in thegame. Arma works better with Intel than AMD.

Graphics cards basically only dictates how good the game can look with shadows, shaders, AA and so on. Make it better looking that your hardware can handle, that will indirectly drop fps. The game does NOT support Sli or Crossfire well (I have Sli).

7200rpm harddisk streaming is too slow, SSD are good enough. Amount of ram or other stuff dosent really matter that much at all.

In short, if you have the game on a 7200rpm or similar spin disk. I would upgrade that to a SSD. Otherwise its new motherboard, CPU and Ram and depending on what you already have its not a given the gain with a newer CPU would overal be worth it.
Last edited by JojoTheSlayer; Apr 7, 2016 @ 10:37pm
Originally posted by JojoTheSlayer:
Originally posted by Gary the Savage Snail:
How much does RAM affect fps? I have 1 stick of 8gb, would I get a significant increase in performance if I got another stick on 8gb?

Zero...
If you have the game on a 7200rpm spin disk you will notice more texture poping compared to a decent SSD and that might indirectly affect fps at times. If you put the whole game on a Ramdisk (use ram to emulate a harddisk), which I did with Arma 2 as a test, you will get less texture popping compared to a SSD, since a ramdisk is like 4 times faster (also why more ram wont matter if it streams from the harddrive btw), but it will not be practical and noticeable differences.

The amount of ram however doesnt matter. Ether you have enough and the game starts or you dont and it does not. Thats it. The game is inherenlty a 32bit application, not 64bit. So in Windows there is a 2gig limit for such programs at any time. The Arma engine at its core is the same as it was back in Operation Flashpoint days.

Biggest fps limiter in Arma is the CPU because of the independent type AI used in thegame. Arma works better with Intel than AMD.

Graphics cards basically only dictates how good the game can look with shadows, shaders, AA and so on. Make it better looking that your hardware can handle, that will indirectly drop fps. The game does NOT support Sli or Crossfire well (I have Sli).

7200rpm harddisk streaming is too slow, SSD are good enough. Amount of ram or other stuff dosent really matter that much at all.

In short, if you have the game on a 7200rpm or similar spin disk. I would upgrade that to a SSD. Otherwise its new motherboard, CPU and Ram and depending on what you already have its not a given the gain with a newer CPU would overal be worth it.

If I overclocked from 4.0ghz to 4.2, how much of a difference would there be?
FOV Crusader Apr 7, 2016 @ 11:23pm 
It doesn't. You'd have to go out of your way to make RAM effect proformance; and even then only by like half a frame.
If you're worried about your RAM, you can just download some here: http://downloadmoreram.com/

Or, you could upgrade and download some WAM (2nd gen RAM): http://www.downloadmorewam.com/
JojoTheSlayer Apr 8, 2016 @ 5:06am 
Originally posted by Gary the Savage Snail:
If I overclocked from 4.0ghz to 4.2, how much of a difference would there be?

4200/4000*100=105 (Gain 5%)
How many fps more do you think you would get with a 5% increase in performance?

Is your 4gh the stock speed or turbo speed. Because games use the tubo speed when applications need them. Example. I have a 4770K at stock speed which is 3,5gh, but its turbo speed is 3.9gh. So if you have a rather new CPU with stock at 4gh and turbo at 4,4gh. You would actually lose performance because OCing usually means you lock the speed at "max" all the time and it wont go over 4,2gh. Secondly, if you have a modern i5 or i7 at 4gh it wont be worth it bying a new motherboard etc ether.
4400/4200*100=95,45 (Loss 4,4%)

I used to OC before. First I had it at 4,5gh (gave a 5-10 fps more), then I needed to lower it to 4,2gh (gave about 3fps more from 3,9gh, aka 8% vs your 5% gain) and then I just had to stop the whole thing because I just got too many BSODs (OC software from Asus if people wondered). This with a H110 280mm closed loop liquid CPU cooler. So, if you think you are gonna OC on your stock cooler from Intel, foget it. If you think its going to be worth it, LoL.

That said, 4,2gh does seem to be the sweet spot for Arma 3, but thats more about having 26fps in places you would have 23fps instead, but you, who have a 100 more mh wouldnt notice this in places I noticed it. Bottom line is. Your next CPU should be as high as possible and not under 4,2gh with turbo if you can afford it, but OCing your current CPU is NOT worth it and on stock cooler its most likley not a doable thing.

--------------------------
For others with more OCing knowledge than me. Yes, I know OC programs are ♥♥♥♥. Yes, I know people can get lucky with their chip and I was probably not, but overall. Learning propper OCing from scratch and investing $ in propper cooling to get 2fps more in one game is NOT worth the hassle even if its possible. It will also shorten the life of the CPU and run the system at a higher heat which means more noise and so on. Its NOT worth it for Arma 3 alone.
--------------------------


You are better of tweaking your settings better.
If you have a i5 or i7 at 4gh and a GTX780 or better you should be getting upper tier performance.

I uploaded 3 images of my settings. You can try them out and see if you like the look better, but try object range at 2000m first before pushing it up to 4000m because that setting is more in regards to tank warfare and not infantry and therefor is a waste of performance that hits the CPU hard if you are not a tanker.

Image link: (4770k stock, single GTX780 ACX settings, SSD hardisk)
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197970616511/screenshots/
Last edited by JojoTheSlayer; Apr 8, 2016 @ 5:37am
JojoTheSlayer Apr 8, 2016 @ 5:15am 
Originally posted by Booker DeWitt:
It doesn't. You'd have to go out of your way to make RAM effect proformance; and even then only by like half a frame. If you're worried about your RAM, you can just download some here

This is BS. Dont link to malware!
< >
Showing 1-15 of 41 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Apr 6, 2016 @ 11:15pm
Posts: 41