Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Maybe it could be a spin-off title but not a "proper" successor of A3.
The flight model is a joke, the first person combat is utter wank. If CiG don't hurry up some other developer will deliver everything, without the pay to win or expensive ship packages.
You can argue that it still isn't finished. Well they have taken since 2011 and still haven't nailed the flight. Their progress and delivery sends up warning flags.
Yep, but I only tested it out, didn't delve that deep into it. My first thought was "Doom 3 meets Wing Commander" or along those lines.
I'm actually not fetishizing SC like some people seem to be doing and I agree that their business model is rather off-putting, still, it would be insincere to say that it's not a highly ambitious title.
Even if it's taking years to make and, ironically enough, might be the last in the line of the modern-day "space sims" which it helped ressurect in the first place (this genre of games was pretty much dead before SC got a huge success with crowd sourcing, which encouraged the likes of Elite Dangerous and NMS to materalize).
"We plan to keep Arma3 fresh and exciting for several more years" - 2018.
"Arma 4 is not in development"
Arma 4 isn't even planned, and won't start production for a long time. They haven't even said they intend to make Arma 4. Right now they are just trying to finish the EnFusion engine.
The best metric we have is DayZ standalone. *shrug*
I lowkey know that this is the truth but it's nice to keep some hope , i always think why even have arma 4, the only reason would be the engine improvment ( visuals and mechanics...) But their slow advance with DayZ current engine makes me think that the engine itself won't be near complete to be able to run arma 4
need. monoliths..
Arma 5 should be fought between dinosaurs
If Bohemia Interactive wanted to really hit the players, they should focus strictly on an era that provided a good conflict on a moderately-to-massively sized scale. I would say if Bohemia went for a World War II setting, or a 80s - 90s setting, they would be good. Not only would said companies be less inclined to push their IPs on Bohemia, but without the sour feelings of the more recent wars.