Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
From my experience, Khan's and Hakkapeliitta's traits clash: when a Khan and Hakkapeliitta start a turn stacked onto each other, the Khan's movement rate (5) is in fact *reduced* to that of the Hakkapeliitta (4) ! The Khan does regain his normal movement if the Hakkapeliitta moves out of the tile first however. Still, this means that there is no real positive synergy between the UUs
I have to say however that I discovered this playing as Venice, when *both* units were gifted to me by city-states, so I can't really rule out that this only happens in that specific case.
Most propably the rest of your guide is just as awesome as the beginnig - great work, thumbs up.
Here are some reasons for conquering City-States. There may seem like quite a few, but many of them are rather situational."
Got a duplicate, there.