Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
From my experience, Khan's and Hakkapeliitta's traits clash: when a Khan and Hakkapeliitta start a turn stacked onto each other, the Khan's movement rate (5) is in fact *reduced* to that of the Hakkapeliitta (4) ! The Khan does regain his normal movement if the Hakkapeliitta moves out of the tile first however. Still, this means that there is no real positive synergy between the UUs
I have to say however that I discovered this playing as Venice, when *both* units were gifted to me by city-states, so I can't really rule out that this only happens in that specific case.
Most propably the rest of your guide is just as awesome as the beginnig - great work, thumbs up.
Here are some reasons for conquering City-States. There may seem like quite a few, but many of them are rather situational."
Got a duplicate, there.