Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Theres 2 major issues with the matchmaking .
Firstly , Too many newish players are in a higher skill bracket then they should be.
Secondly the balanceing is bad , just because you have 1 simliar skilled player in each team , doesnt make it balanced .Its a race to snowball , If i mid with a low win game team/enemy , and snowball we win , If i go support/low impact hero , we more then likely lose and the other teams 'higher skilled' player will snowball.
But, like I said, it matches you up based on the assumption that you will do as much to affect the outcome of a game as you possibly can. If it operated on the opposite metric, games would still be imbalanced, just in a different direction.
Also, the game ranks players based on overall skill, which could be quite different from hero to hero. A system for more balanced play might ask people to pick a role and hero before it organized, but then you would might still have problems with enforcing the roles people chose, as well as eliminating the entire concept of counter-picking (as well as needing to objectively evaluate hero match-ups so you don't see tons of players complaining about the game always assigning them their hard-counter.
Like I said, it's almost infinitely complex.
Next time you play a few random PuB matches, look up all the players you play with and against, win or lose. Maybe get a friend to try and figure out which ones he thought you won or lost just based on who your teammates where, and see how it turns out.
ps i found rarely that ONE player dominate whole game, in most cases is team job, because its team game.
I hope you are kidding .
Yeah , people with 500 games that only snowball with pub basher heroes and cant play all heroes, excatly the same skill level as a 2k games player.
Everygame i check all my team mates stats/dotabuff. I get matched with people with LESS games and LOWER winrate . At 500 games you know everyhero /build/counter/jukes? Very doubtful.
The mm is just broken , dont hue hue hue 300 wins player iz good yo. Most arent, or can play 1 hero well.
I know everyhero build , every counter ect due to the amount of games iv'e had , its unfair to be matched with people that DONT know this . Its unfair on me AND them.. An easy fix would be just to limit the difference in total games. But naaa them 300 game players know everything , can micro visage perfectly , and im just a ♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Ofc people have bad and good games , but not knowing how to play gyro , or visage , Doom with vanguard radiance ags refresher as the hardcarry , its just gg at start
I missread what you said - A 300 win player just is nowhere near the same skill bracket as a 2k game player - So why match them with 2k game players.
I can semi understand the ' high ell smurf' stuff , but i check there dotabuffs , they usually have 45-49% win rate.
As i said - i dont blame the players - i blame the mm
Let's try to keep this discussion civil, please. There is no reason to get personal with the insults.
According to Dotabuff, you've got a little less than 1,700 matches played. What number of matches would you say is the minimum that someone needs to be able to play on your level? 1600? 1500? 1200? I'm curious.
Also, remember that the matching system tries to find the best fit in a limited amount of time. How long do you wait for these matches? How long WOULD you be willing to wait? If you had 20 minutes in between every game because that's how long it took to assemble 9 other people with 1600-1800 matches (no more and no less) and similar win-rates, would you still be willing to play the game?
Statistically, its impossible for everyone to always play with people who are better or more experienced than you; at some point you will need to be the better/best person on your team, and support the others to some degree.
The mm is just bad , theres enough players , it should range total games so i'm/others are matched with people with between x-y games ie 1.5k-2.5k games , or something else realtive to your games.
Instead i assume it gos on an ell bracket ( Between x-y 'skill level')
Which then gos back to my first issue. Low game accounts being in the wrong skill bracket/ell rated higher then it should.
I don't know why people deffend this bad mm , and valve doesnt adress it correctly.
Its a complicated matter that will never be perfect but it could be improved greatly