安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
That's a great question: I hope a developer will answer this question. If so, could they also answer if the recomended requirements have changed.
Kind of. I used to run the game on a 2.98 Core 2 Dual, 4 GB DDR2, and a GTX 560 on 1280x600 everything off and I struggled to get 40 FPS.
Now, on my new computer with a i5 4670k, 8 GB DDR3 and GTX 560, on 1650x1050 medium low settings I'm getting around 100~120 FPS.
Don't expect on recommended to play the game well on a high resolution.
Well, they were in the beginning. On ultra low settings, textures are basically off and that should help people at the recommended to actually play the game. Game looks fairly ugly at that setting, but frame rates ARE better.
Still, given my experience on a machine that was basically recommended and now on a machina that's well beyond recommended, it seems the only real way to get a decent experience in graphics and frames is to buy better hardware. I know my shotgun kill rate has gone way up.
I have Core 2 Duo @2,66, 4GB Ram and Radeon HD 6800. Will it work?
If you're willing to play at a lower resolution (read sub 1280) on low graphical settings, it will run at a decent frame rate