Инсталирайте Steam
вход
|
език
Опростен китайски (简体中文)
Традиционен китайски (繁體中文)
Японски (日本語)
Корейски (한국어)
Тайландски (ไทย)
Чешки (Čeština)
Датски (Dansk)
Немски (Deutsch)
Английски (English)
Испански — Испания (Español — España)
Испански — Латинска Америка (Español — Latinoamérica)
Гръцки (Ελληνικά)
Френски (Français)
Италиански (Italiano)
Индонезийски (Bahasa Indonesia)
Унгарски (Magyar)
Холандски (Nederlands)
Норвежки (Norsk)
Полски (Polski)
Португалски (Português)
Бразилски португалски (Português — Brasil)
Румънски (Română)
Руски (Русский)
Финландски (Suomi)
Шведски (Svenska)
Турски (Türkçe)
Виетнамски (Tiếng Việt)
Украински (Українська)
Докладване на проблем с превода
That's a great question: I hope a developer will answer this question. If so, could they also answer if the recomended requirements have changed.
Kind of. I used to run the game on a 2.98 Core 2 Dual, 4 GB DDR2, and a GTX 560 on 1280x600 everything off and I struggled to get 40 FPS.
Now, on my new computer with a i5 4670k, 8 GB DDR3 and GTX 560, on 1650x1050 medium low settings I'm getting around 100~120 FPS.
Don't expect on recommended to play the game well on a high resolution.
Well, they were in the beginning. On ultra low settings, textures are basically off and that should help people at the recommended to actually play the game. Game looks fairly ugly at that setting, but frame rates ARE better.
Still, given my experience on a machine that was basically recommended and now on a machina that's well beyond recommended, it seems the only real way to get a decent experience in graphics and frames is to buy better hardware. I know my shotgun kill rate has gone way up.
I have Core 2 Duo @2,66, 4GB Ram and Radeon HD 6800. Will it work?
If you're willing to play at a lower resolution (read sub 1280) on low graphical settings, it will run at a decent frame rate