Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thanks!
Yeah, a bit busy with 10.0 at the moment, but I'm pleased to see this and will keep it in mind!
That's great work!
Chairman Meow and I have a draft as well, that's *even more* detailed. Adding Gruyers, Aigle, Visp/Brig, Solothurn, Toggenburg, Sargans, Kyburg, though cutting some of the central cantons.
Over on IR we recently put together this version of Switzerland. Not quite as detailed, but the high elevation differential made clickability an issue. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DqOeF-0U8AAgm5B.jpg:large
Interesting! That actually looks like some of what I was thinking about if I needed to make some cuts.
I am curious though as to why you decided to represent Bern and Zürich as Independent tags. From my research I found that Bern joined the Swiss Confederation in 1353 and Zürich joined in 1351. While I do recognize that all the members of the Confederation were very independent and persuade their own foreign policies I don't see what is different about those two versus the other Cantons other than that Bern & Zürich are larger and wealthier and thus were able to be more aggressive. In my personal opinion I felt that either all the members of the Confederation should be represented under the SWI tag or they all ought to be independent in some sort of permanent alliance. Because I know that several of the central cantons waged their own wars independently or in some partial combination during this period. Uri for example invaded the Milanese alps quite a few times.
Other than that I like what you did and think that it makes a lot of sense as a compromise to provide greater detail without (potentially) drastically altering playability.
Zurich should definitely be it's own tag. In 1444 it was in the middle of a war with the rest of Swiss Confederation over who gets the former Toggenburg lands.
Totally correct about that. That's what I get for saying something without checking back over my notes. It still doesn't explain the independent Bern though. Although, the Old Zurich War really does raise the question of how to represent the Old Swiss confederation in-game as it genuinely was a confederation of otherwise independent territories that very much pursued their own interests, often aggressively and occasionally in contradiction to each other. But at the same time the connection was tighter than a mere alliance, see as how Zurich was re-admitted almost immediately after the conflict over the Toggenburg land subsided. It is difficult to represent accurately within the EU 4 engine.
Maybe reusing the native federation mechanics could work. Having then start as a federation, however you can only have a limited number of members I believe. Alternatively a new subject type of sorts could work, it is just a question of who would be the overlord, maybe a central forest canton province would.