Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If I may add my opinion about this. I'm 100% on board with the oil wells, oil wells and coal and iron are candidates that can make the map really feel overcrowded, and it's not easy to balance this without making things too easy or to cheap to achieve, but senseless definitly needs some fine tuning from 1900 onwards, really like the idea with the 2 lvl oil well.
I think slaughterhouse and forrests are fine as they are, if the slaughterhouse would get nerfed it would not sum up nicely with the livestock farms and I have no porblem with a slaughterhouse fully supporting a food processing plant, I also like that it has another feel to the food chain compared too grain and milk.
Regarding forrests, my fear is that, giving them to much production would simplify the supply of sawmills too much because you would only need one forrest for one sawmill and personally I wouldn't like that.