Garry's Mod

Garry's Mod

Pz.Kpfw. VI Tiger Ausf. B mit 10.5 L/68
37 Comments
Violet Pijin May 12, 2018 @ 8:55pm 
i cant find the tanks
Marcelievsky May 9, 2017 @ 3:46pm 
Yes, this vehicle is impossible. The time the German army would have to analyze and create a prototype and put it into action would be equivalent to putting it into operation in the Korean War
Moon.  [author] Apr 26, 2017 @ 2:51am 
It would have still been a logistical nightmare. Developing a new caliber just for the sake of a slight improvement on a vehicle is not worth it.
Zoopark Apr 25, 2017 @ 7:58pm 
Developing an entirely new calibre and ammunition takes time. And the Germans didn't have time,.
Dr_Skoda Apr 25, 2017 @ 6:21pm 
Well, providing if they went on stress free from allied bombing, things might have been different
Moon.  [author] Apr 25, 2017 @ 3:37pm 
Depends on how the ammunition is designed. The 105 required two piece ammunition because it was based on a naval gun, which requires two piece ammunition.

Do you understand how difficult making up a new caliber is? It's easier to refine guns of existing caliber. It would have been easier to redesign a 105 gun than to make a whole new caliber.
Dr_Skoda Apr 25, 2017 @ 2:57pm 
Well they couldve made up the caliber from scratch, like the 88, but now i realize, doesnt a 100mm require two piece?
Moon.  [author] Apr 25, 2017 @ 2:33pm 
Germany had no 95mm or 100mm guns.

Plus the problem was not the caliber, it was the fact that the gun used two-piece ammunition.
Dr_Skoda Apr 25, 2017 @ 2:25pm 
There couldve been a perfect middleground between the 88mm and 105mm range to give the tiger II a decent yet practical preformance, say 100mm or 95mm
Moon.  [author] Apr 24, 2017 @ 5:58am 
I already told you I do not have access to them mate.
hp_max Apr 24, 2017 @ 5:52am 
you
Moon.  [author] Apr 23, 2017 @ 7:56am 
Who?
hp_max Apr 23, 2017 @ 7:37am 
he can try to do damage model?
hp_max Apr 23, 2017 @ 7:35am 
;(
Moon.  [author] Apr 23, 2017 @ 6:59am 
I do not have access to the damaged models, so no.
hp_max Apr 23, 2017 @ 6:19am 
Moon add weack model plz
Moon.  [author] Apr 23, 2017 @ 4:16am 
Plus the two piece ammunition would reduce the fire rate of the vehicle.
Zoopark Apr 22, 2017 @ 6:04pm 
+Kommandant4298 The Tiger II Ausf. B (H) was planned to be refitted with a 105mm cannon but the design was rejected due to the insanely tight space the turret would be if they added a second loader which was neccessary to load the cannon because of its larger, two piece ammunition, the new cannon would also mean that it would use more expensive and less produced ammo, thus creating logistical problems, The designs were rejected and the only reason this varient is in the game is because of a single design sketch that was found.
Zoopark Apr 22, 2017 @ 6:01pm 
What are your plans for the next model?
Kommandant4298 Apr 22, 2017 @ 6:01pm 
So Germany tried to re-arm the King Tiger with a 105mm eh? Huh. Never knew that.
둘기 Apr 22, 2017 @ 5:39pm 
i love warthunder
BonoBono Apr 22, 2017 @ 5:17pm 
ok:steamhappy:
Moon.  [author] Apr 22, 2017 @ 5:15pm 
Not for now.
BonoBono Apr 22, 2017 @ 5:14pm 
next USA M103 plz
Karl Big D Apr 22, 2017 @ 4:08pm 
cool
Moon.  [author] Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:42pm 
I already have all those planned. But at the time I am working on something else.
Sketchystan Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:40pm 
may i suggest the T-54 Mod. 1951(?) T-62, and Type 62 light as possible future additions from the war thunder files? thanks! :D (these are awesome! :) )
Moon.  [author] Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:24pm 
Not at this time.
Moon.  [author] Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:16pm 
I know what they are mate. And I just told you I am missing components and cannot release the model because of that.
Moon.  [author] Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:09pm 
The ratte can not be done since I am missing components of it.
hp_max Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:04pm 
what next? mause? p.1000?
hp_max Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:03pm 
oh ok
Moon.  [author] Apr 22, 2017 @ 2:03pm 
Not now.
hp_max Apr 22, 2017 @ 1:57pm 
T 54 1949 or T55A
magvera bushmaster Apr 22, 2017 @ 12:24pm 
time to go visit stalin komrades :)