Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem






1) I like simultaneous action selection as opposed to having to wait for each other player in sequence to decide if they should spend a card. Though, now that I write this, planning everything in one go is likely more inducing of analysis paralysis and thus time-consuming than having players doing it in turn order. So maybe the *time* argument is bad. Regardless, I like simultaneous action selection because of...
2) ...the mind games of trying to predict what or how far the other players are moving phase markers so that I can plan what I should move. This adds strategy to an otherwise quite chaotic game.
But as long as you're having fun with the game I'm happy and you should house rule any way works best for you. Thanks for the comment! It made me at least stop and consider if the Stop cards are still carrying their weight.
Of course, if you house rule to change it there are ways to remove the Stop cards while still having the rules be robust (though different). Either by spending one card at a time (or pass) until everyone around the table have passed (or maybe everyone have passed in a row). Or by giving the last player (as decided by the first player marker) anadvantage by having each player in order spend all the cards they want *after* seeing what the players before them have moved.
While I'm always a fan of getting rid of components, since it makes games cheaper to print, ie easier to get published, the Stop cards are likely to stay for now, for two reasons.
(1/2)
I also took the time to add in some comments in yellow about what's different when playing on Tabletop Simulator as opposed to playing the game with my real life prototype.
10/10 it was okey ~ ign
also my pink fluffy dinosaur died real fast
~9/10 ign -best mod of the year award-
really cool guy and already a fun game for a work in progress
1. remove all the rules and Put it on the tablet item, you can actually have it so the players can (on loading the game) agree to go to the website. but it will reduce the need for the rule cards.
2. instead of loading a custom table, just croped the game board, and upload it as a custom board. this will use up a LOT less space and reduce the errors.
Other then those, my friend still got crashed out due to the 88 cards for some reason.
The rules are now a bit less high resolution meaning they will probably load, but the text is harder to read. Since this is annoying I've also put them on dropbox at {tinyurl DOT com SLASH madsciencerules} and added the link to the notepad.
Some of the game cards in the deck were also higher resolution than I'd intended, so all card files are now at the same (lower) resolution.
Also, since the latest update to Tabletop Simulator added a bug where custom tables won't load for people entering the room after the table was loaded, I've added the link to the custom table in the notepad so that the host can reload it without reloading the whole mod (and resetting the game).
The playtesters I've had have not had crash issues that I've noticed. (But then again, if someone enters the room and crashes to desktop it would probably look very much looking like someone entering and just exiting.)
Wacky fun!