Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem






@Que.tea - Depends on what kind of bonuses you mean. Opinion bonus?
@Squidian The BoFish - Nope, but will probably make a compatibility patch for it, but not before january at least
@ king0billy - added to an ongoing game should be fine but all features will not be available (would require a fresh save). I have no idea what happens if you remove the mod from an ongoing game.
@ Kapitalisti - I see. As I mentioned above, a comptibility patch with CFP is planned.
@ Renown - I see how that could happen. When a family member in the same court has the thrall trait, the court owner should normally remove the thrall trait for family members. Normally the AI should also offer to pay ransom for their enslaved family members, but perhaps this should be tweaked to happen more often (and the AI accepting it more often). Will look into it!
I could list the ways - but for one, having thralls happen for married noble characters creates situations where you have kings and emperors with a wife, concubines, lovers, soulmates and children who are all thralls because they got raided one time.
Now, historically this could make sense - but only if you create easy (for the AI at least) paths to get these family members back and unthralled.
I've just watched the Karlings, Sigurdrs, House of Wessex, and the scottish royal family just get wiped from existence in the same two year time frame. Kings sit there and never attempt to get new heirs?
And how does it generally work with other mods, is it very lightwieght or can I expect some problems in a heavy modlist?
Tnx!
@hamletisdead - Done! Set the limit to 2000 characters, think that should be plenty!
@Perambulante in tenebr - I have too much on my plate to make a patch for it at the moment. If I get the original creators permission I could perhaps add the feature to his mod in the future
@ck3user7748 - For me all those virtues are listed as they should, but let me know if you still have issues.
@Rhodie Ranger - Oops, you are right, forgot to change that. I just posted an update to fix that, so now the anarya will be neither eunuchs or sodomites, and their sexuality is random as for any npc.
@Interpres Crucifier - Strange, never had this issue, just checked again and he appears as he should for me. Do you use any other mods?
* Shinto and Shugendo now have slavery set to shunned
* Anarya descriptions have been revised a bit
* Issue with XP not increasing for army traits should be resolved now
* Cranial trophies tenet should work now
* Issue with poet tenet not appearing as a virtue is fixed.
@yaminogajin - Am planning to get around to abrahamic faiths eventually. I have already added some flavour and faiths for abrahamic religions, but at some point I want to make an update focusing on them
@ Drommeren - That sounds strange, will do some testing and see if I can replicate the issue and hopefully fix it. Is it a historical character you're playing as or a custom character? Do you have the same issue if you play as another character? Do you have the same issue if all other mods are turned off?
@Marxista-Leninista and Rhodie Ranger - I see that there is some disagreement on the topic. I will however look over the descriptions and see what I can change to make them better.
@obcorbino2146 - I have no idea actually, sorry.
No, what it resembles is transphobic attitudes towards trans women. By “Asian third genders” I assume you mean the Hijra? Because the Hijra call themselves women. So do all of those “third gender” categories, actually. I’d recommend you read the sources about those so called “third genders”, like Serena Nanda’s “Neither Man Nor Woman”, which is the basis of most modern study of “third genders” and also features Nanda purposefully ignoring Hijra calling themselves trans women because they can’t give birth. Or perhaps start with a deconstruction of the topic. Here’s a link to one.
https://taliabhattwrites.substack.com/p/the-third-sex
Maybe in another field, like historical gender studies?
"Anarya" meaning "non-man", it's more likely that they were indeed considered something different from just women, either a third gender or, at most, a very specific category of women: this resembles the terms used for the third gender categories in many Asian and south pacific cultures.
What I will readily agree on, is that the etiology of the "illness of women", as Hippocrates called it, that they thought they were afflicted with, was relatively likely to have been the same as non-homosexual gender dysphoria today.
Personally I think the description is fine as it is.
I started a game with a character who has the Perunovery faith (unreformed Slavic faith), which does not appear to have any Apparel Doctrines, however my ruler is wearing headware that I cannot take off no matter what I try unless I remove this mod!
I'm a sucker for fine tuning my ruler and dynasty character outfits, so I was hoping/wondering if this was something that might be looked into?
@Cat_and_cat_inc - it's covered by judaism and Islam having the "restricted" meat attitude. The doctrine description have Jewish and Islamic flavour text going into details about slaughtering.
@kincaidseriin - thank you!
@Marxista-Leninista - interesting, so would you suggest keeping things as they are then?