Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
I don't think you will mind, but I've create a custom race in Stellaris and have uploaded it to the Steam Workshop called Tholian Assembly.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2816871755
In the Steam Workshop description for it, I list you as inspiring the creation of the mod, and share links to your aaronfranke's Star Trek empires (Achievement compatible) mod collection.
https://steamcommunity.com/workshop/filedetails/?id=1648311001
I don't think it should be a problem, but wanted to give you the courtesy of being notified beforehand. Thanks for listening and for creating the Star Trek empires mod collection!
Xindi were afraid of Humans but they co-exist as 5 species on one planet, they're likely Xenophile because of the exposure effect, but I doubt they could easily be modeled in Stellaris without heavy modding.
Denobulans would be Fanatic Xenophile but they are not at all fleshed out in Star Trek. The only ones we ever see are Dr. Phlox and his wives. We have no clue how their government or other traits or anything else is. Similarly, Ocampa and Talaxians only have one member we ever see (and Ocampans are extinct AFAWK).
Trills could be Xenophile, they're somewhat fleshed out, but still only one common character (Dax).
Ferengi are Xenophobe and Pacifist. Perhaps Megacorp is best for them.
Breen are the "mysterious" isolationist race, definitely Xenophobe, I don't think that Stellaris allows modeling isolationist outside of Fallen Empires.
Kazon are a copy-paste of Klingons, definitely Xenophobe. I could probably model them easily in Stellaris but it would basically be the same as Klingons, so it's not too interesting to do.
@Elonwhite Most Xenophile races near the Federation would probably join the Federation, so we don't see them fleshed out as their own race. But most of the Federation members are small, it doesn't seem they've ever fleshed out any other significant members other than Vulcans and Andorians as being advanced space empires. http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Federation_members
Possible federation candidates for being a species in Stellaris:
* Risians: Definitely Xenophile, but not a big empire or anything. Also, very similar to Humans...
* Betazoids: They look down at other races for not being telepathic but they might be xenophile. Also not a big empire AFAIK.
* Rigellians maybe, but not very fleshed out in Star Trek.
* Bajorans are also a small empire AFAIK, they might be Xenophile but they really hate Cardassians.
I do agree with the Effincent Bureaucracy as a good choice, I just went a different route on representing them in stellaris then shown here.
Really might be a better choice, but higher leader levels do make them more efficent too in the long run from the bonuses on all levels, as pacifists they get more core planets too.
I guess I failed to see there, starting attitude towards humans and such. So my bad, i was only thinking of the interactions they developed over time to protecting species (as the prime directive was from what I found really inspired and influenced by them in the federation.)
So xenophile may have been a bad choice. Thanks for the input on that.
Why does materialist have to mean robots? I mean, it can, and in Stellaris it does, but Vulcans are incredibly logical and are materialist in every way except for having robots. I see "materialist" as "logical" and "practical".
Meritocracy is a good choice, but I'm not sure if I'd want to replace Efficient Bureaucracy.
Good point about choosing to be slow breeders on purpose. I'll update the description for that, but there's nothing to change in the mod files themselves.
but i did choose Slow breeders, and Sedentary, as the two negatives, with
traditonal and Intelligent as the positves, (left the open point for future gen application)
but i view Materialist etho as serious ROBO fans/want to be robotic, and Vulcans just do not strike me as such at all.
Also if you really look at it they only joined the Federation out of need/it was a good thing to do.
But mostly out of need due to events that took place. Which is odd, as several other major races do simliar things with allying with the Federation due to major events. (moons blowing up.....)
something seems like its pushing for a Federation to grow....something....seems so odd about how it all works out.
I also did Functional Architecture, which made sense
(we both probably had a simliar line of thought as to why.)
I really did want Academic Prilivege or Utopian living standards, so been tempted to change them to either etho to get it. but currently liking a government as F-Xenophile.
-I disagree with Materialist, As much as they view logic, and use it, they are not machine focused.
(hence the intellegent race trait, as a government they are not pro machine synthetic race)
-But they are not religious focused either, in fact I believe that Traditionalist race trait expresses those religious traditional belief's (by essence the UNITY).
-Pacifist is totally them tho, dont know about Fanatic on it, but it is them. They avoid war and only do so when needed, or no choice.
== I choose Fanatic Xenophile, as i have too many governments with Egalitarian in my lists, but choosing egalitarian, and Xenophile whould of been my two other picks.
(I just wanted a Fanatic Xenopile faction.)