Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Subscribe.
Did I just walk into a debate about science on a mod for _dragons_?
**** you, internet.
The latter actually surprised me. A creationist once said they believed in the endothermic nature of dinos. But I can see how that is as hard to prove with fossils like the behavior and physio presumed by Evolutionary paleontologists. The Answers in Genesis people actually do compare the rock feathers and scales of fossils to show that the petrification process ruins any proof by comparision for a dino-bird evolution because it leaves the scales sometimes inaccurate to the original scale. But in that link they focus on the dissimilarity allowed for by evolutionary paleontologists.
The notion of sources being the same as science is an excuse this long time debator has heard more than once, and is only for securing the influence of supposed authorities. I am seeking evidence. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jun/03/most-dinosaurs-had-scales-not-feathers-fossil-analysis-concludes
I have called out the credibility of the source you quote already, and it is not even the original source. Fossils are. I have made a statement of information you have never heard in your entire life. And yet you don't even have your interest piqued or intelligence bristling at the thought. You are defending your what you have been taught previously, what I have called into question. And you only quote the challenged data for its own defense. There is no logic here, only a mentality and readiness to maintain conviction through the prior reasons for your beliefs.
bethesda SHOULD have done this because who the hell thinks that a flying creature (even one as big as a dragon) would have solid bones that weigh a ton >.<
also to the haters of this kind of mod... why? sheesh this DOES do somethin of use... it makes it so your backpack isnt weighted down when youre a lower lvl smith who doesnt have high stam
If dragons 'fly' using magic - that would explain it.
also, they are for show :P but who cares, rlly.. as long as their bones are lighter now, im happy, and my bag is happy.