安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
@Vibrax: The displayed 1 appears if the game thinks the power of the station is just too ridiculous to display. :) I actually thought I fixed that, though I didn't test it with any version beyond 1.8.x.
Oh, and obsolescence doesn't work on the heavy particle lance.
The class restrictions should probably be implemented. Heavy tachyon lances are a *bit* OP on battleships.
See the screenshot, it works for me. Though in that case you have to add quite some normal reactors. Only if you try use 100% heavy autocannon (the Vulcan) which requires even more energy you may hit the hard limit. Either way I wanted that even if you go that far that there is still some room to fiddle arround, to have some more shield or some more damage. Otherwise it would be quite boring, wouldn't it? :) Also as mentioned, you may hit the point where the station power is displayed as 1 and I don't know if that will confuse the AI to much, like undertaking suicide missions. Btw. armor levels also add a quite some shield reg rate not only raw shield points. That can get quite nasty with a lot of shields. :)
Of course, you have no obligation to respond to it, but I am glad if you are able to support.
I am very satisfied that XL weapons can be placed on the fortress.