GemCraft - Chasing Shadows

GemCraft - Chasing Shadows

Poolbound vs Bloodbound
200
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
Download
"Showcase of the power of Poolbound and Bloodbound varying various parameters.
The initial set is reasonable for a wizard of WL 1k and shows the crossover at g30"
14 Comments
Captain1nsaneo Dec 21, 2019 @ 2:56am 
*clapping*
Kean Feb 6, 2019 @ 9:02am 
I've downloaded Mathematica and .nb file. I have never used this program. When I press evaluate notebook the program freezes. I want to see the changes manually so how can I run the script?
David Allen Jun 21, 2018 @ 8:24pm 
This would be a nightmare, but It'd be nice if you could do it as a 3D graph, with the hit level/mana pool level be the additional axis. There are 7 dimentions to this, and graphs don't work well beyond 3, though.
helix2 Jun 2, 2018 @ 5:06am 
Very cool, wish I could slow or stop it though. Is there a way to tell the bloodstones 'hit level'? I've looked and don't see it... probably missing something obvious. Is that program on the web somewhere?
OSMO_1457 Mar 28, 2017 @ 3:58am 
This is very interesting knowledge.:skilltome:
sleep Apr 26, 2016 @ 6:28pm 
Thanks very much!
12345ieee  [author] Apr 26, 2016 @ 4:07pm 
sleep Apr 26, 2016 @ 2:43am 
Nice graph. I'd be interested in seeing that notebook file if possible.
zoigo Mar 14, 2016 @ 5:23am 
Of course it is from GitHub page, sorry if i sounded too frank/familiar.
12345ieee  [author] Mar 13, 2016 @ 10:17pm 
Hi zoigo.
I assume you scraped my name from my Github profile, as there's no way I know someone from your country personally.

The tool used is https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica/ , which is a programming language whose primary IDE is a notebook interface very similar to Jupyter notebooks (which I use for fun and profit, too). This plot and the .gif generation are ~30 lines of code.

The Poolbound and Bloodbound formulas have been taken from the game code, you can find everything here: https://gist.github.com/12345ieee/4a81c78d4426a99c4bc3 a bit scattered around.

I thought about putting a watermark in the bottom left of the image, but it seemed too tacky