安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Feathers must have been used for mating displays, visual pattern disruption, and all sorts of other visual communications, because they must have used all these functions long before evolving into Dinos. Also, since we don't know exactly how much color Dinos could see (presumably not quite as much as is possible now) my guess would be there would be far more diversity in color and pattern in early life for a number of reasons:
Advanced feather rex looks better though.
I don't think T-Rex looking like a chicken is too far from reality, since they are related. I mean, most birds don't stand with fully straightened legs, they are in an almost permanent squatting position [only their 'ankles' tend to be straight when standing]. This puts the center of gravity at their knees [and toward the center of their torso] rather than at their hips, which tends to be just behind their center of gravity. With that in mind, there would likely be a skin flap stretched between their knee and ribcage [like chickens have].
I would say if someone has a problem with T-Rex looking like a chicken, then they 1) aren't aware of the Chicken's ancestry and 2) have no idea of how terrifying a T-Rex sized chicken with teeth would be, haha.
Feathers don't make something less scary or less cool... it adds a layer of complexity and potential for a lot of cool ideas. ^_^
While there a so much cooler accurate rexes out there like this one:
https://youtu.be/HD8AIlm97lA