Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
有兴趣的人可以参考以下数据:
每周有24万单位的水被循环利用
每周处理280,000单位的水
25 000美元的初始建造费用
每周800美元的保养费。
这也会生成垃圾,而其他两个不会。这是为了模拟并不是所有的东西都能被处理,一些固体废物必须被移走并运送到垃圾场/焚化炉。
对比一下,原来的水泵每周的维修费用为2500美元和240美元,大约产生12万套。而原来的处理厂每周处理约16万套废水,成本约为1.5万美元,维修费用为640美元。所以这在初始建设成本上要多花5000美元同样的水投入和轻微的。
In RL, at least in Winnipeg, most if not all treatment plants and aeration ponds are isolated from ground water and have flood barriers so during a flood, unless the flood water rise over the protecting walls (which would then have sandbag height additions), the polluted flood waters can not effect the water treatment. Also the underground water pipes are naturally pressurized to minimize groundwater entering the system (my father was a plumber in Winnipeg until 1999).
Because of this we also have some treatment plants in or on the edges of actual industrial areas.
With the above in mind, how difficult would it be to create a modified version that was not affected by polluted ground?