Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This is stupidity, like the identification of the Aryans and Germans, which was arranged in the Third Reich.
The very idea that Russia was founded by Swedish conquerors was perceived as an insult, since the theory was proposed only 6 years after the end of the Russo-Swedish War of 1741-1743 which the Russians won (Very wrong time). The rejection of the theory was based on political motives.
In fact, now it is not a theory at all, it is simply a set of actually existing burials, historical evidence, and purely Scandinavian names of rulers at the beginning of Russian annals. Names like Rurik, Helga, Svendoslav, Rogneda Rogvolodovna, who was taken as a concubine by Prince Vladimir, these are all Scandinavian names.