Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
No, no XML. It's all in C#.
Ultimate question is: how are you controlling the values? Is it via xml?
what if the ranges slightly overlapped, so the upermost part of the range for"normal" is the same as the lowermost for "good", the idea being the outliers which are sorta "quality wise not "good", but it's practicly "good".
so, at the most basic:
• Awful: 0.5 to 0.71
• Poor: 0.70 to 0.91
• Normal: 0.9 to 1.15
• Good: 1.14 to 1.31
• Excellent: 1.3 to 1.56
• Masterwork: 1.55 to 2.01
• Legendary: 2.00 to 5.0
of course, the overlap could use some work, and should have a fall off (so it's a lower chance than just a linear range suggests)
We have created a new Discord server. Suggestions, feedback and input on future new features etc all welcome!
https://discord.gg/xWadkMZn35
@Redrum: That's not a bad idea! Added to The List!
@Rtepper: Right?! (But yeah, it's probably a pretty easy fix to make a setting for some of it, and then why not do it...)