Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
No, no XML. It's all in C#.
Ultimate question is: how are you controlling the values? Is it via xml?
what if the ranges slightly overlapped, so the upermost part of the range for"normal" is the same as the lowermost for "good", the idea being the outliers which are sorta "quality wise not "good", but it's practicly "good".
so, at the most basic:
• Awful: 0.5 to 0.71
• Poor: 0.70 to 0.91
• Normal: 0.9 to 1.15
• Good: 1.14 to 1.31
• Excellent: 1.3 to 1.56
• Masterwork: 1.55 to 2.01
• Legendary: 2.00 to 5.0
of course, the overlap could use some work, and should have a fall off (so it's a lower chance than just a linear range suggests)
We have created a new Discord server. Suggestions, feedback and input on future new features etc all welcome!
https://discord.gg/xWadkMZn35
@Redrum: That's not a bad idea! Added to The List!
@Rtepper: Right?! (But yeah, it's probably a pretty easy fix to make a setting for some of it, and then why not do it...)