Why Zeus completely, utterly, and totally sucks.

In this guide I'll show you all the reasons to NOT use Zeus and to use Thor instead.

The pros of Zeus.

- Zeus can do area damage, which can be useful against crowds.

- That's it for the pros...

Cons of Zeus.

- Zeus is not tanky... at all.

- Zeus does very little damage against the more tankier units.

- Zeus does not have a projectile block unlike Thor.

- Zeus doesn't even throw real lightning bolts and instead plastic toy cheap copies of lightning bolts bought from the local Walmart.

Pros of Thor.

- Thor is pretty bulky and deals great damage.

- Thor has a good special ability.

- Thor has a pretty great projectile block.

- Thor looks badass.

Cons of Thor.

- Honestly... there are none.

Thank u1!!1!!1!

Thank you for reading this totally informative guide!

[commandololz]

Thor is a melee unit, which can be a little troubling from time to time, but, still, Thor is often way better than Zeus.

[jacobqmcfarland]

bro the 1000yrd stare again

[amazingfrog16]

i agree

[*Insert something here*]

Zeus is also a ranged unit and can deal with quantity slightly better then Thor. Meanwhile, Thor is good at killing quality troops and small groups, so both are meant to be used for entirely different things and should not be compared to each other.

[El Gurrino]

I literally say that he can do area damage, read before commenting.

[DogMuncher22]

zeus is better cause he is cheaper and thor is legacy so you cant use him in most campaigns also thors area attack is op cause he can clear big groups really easy from the backline

[wrighthtkerris7]

why zeus