Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
@Sigmund: Caria and Lycia, plus those are their names which highlights their iron age selves, are different places.
There are records from Hatti on Troy, certain have Luwian sounding names. Incl Priam (above listed in it's Hittite form if I'm not mistaken), which where a title, like king. So not his actual name. Connection with Piyama-radu is another prominent theory.
Troy doesn't fall into that but because it was big city hub of trade there was a lot of languages spoken, bronze age is the birth of a lot of indo european languages
1)that doesn't make them luwian or assuwan
2)just like you said narrative of Iliad - apart from Homer and Iliad we have almost nothing in written form of the bronze age apart from archaeological sites and we do know Troy was built again and again one on top of the other.
Anyway i digress, trojan names can go as you may i just corrected the greek ones.
Let's not forget very little have survived from the bronze age so we have only assumptions to make in some aspects. :)
To my understanding, contrary to the popular narrative of the Iliad, the Trojans were not Greeks with eastern influence, but either Luwian or Assuwan with Greek influence. So their names don't have to be Greek names, or at the very least not in the same way as in Greece itself.
The Aegean is not my specialty, I have two people I talked with on Discord/ Steam that are much more knowledgeable on Bronze Age Greece and Troy and whatnot. And I trust they gave me the best information one could give me on the topic.
But I am always happy to hear feedback so I greatly appreciate it! :)
Starting
*Hector - Ektoras (Ekoto?? i don't know this language)
*Aeneas - Aineias ✔️
*Achilles - Achilleas (use "ch" )
*Paris - Paris or also known as Alexander as well (Pariziti?? sorry but again what language is this)
*Ajax - Aias ✔️ (tóso megalýteri---this is grammatically and contextually incorrect, your translation means "much bigger" as feminine
what you can do is Aias o Megalyteros (masculine) which grammar is correct but NOT historically
which is Aias o Telamonios ( Aias the son of Telamon but in english the translate it as Ajax the Greater) -- sorry about this long one but i was what drived me to answer as well i am from salamis or Salamina
*Menelaus - Menelaos ✔️
other than that
I didn't notice the horsemen one as I was updating my mod in alignment with the No Cav Mod, but I can edit the horsemen units too in my next update.
And yes, that was mentioned in the comment before yours. Apparently CA gave Assyria Babylonian garrisons and no one knew because every other Meso unit is named "Akkadian". I've been working on fixing that in a mod and it's been reported as a bug to CA.
(Assyrian) Akkadian Horsemen are misspelled "Akkadian Hhorsemen"
Also, I don't think this is your mod, but I've noticed a Weird Thing where Assyrian units appear in native recruitment buildings from villages and Babylonian/Kassite units appear in native recruitment buildings from cities, in southern Mesopotamia/Mat-Tamti/Babylonia/Karduniash.
I see that, hmm. Thanks for pointing this out. Idk why CA made the entirety of the Assyrian garrisons use Babylonian (Mat-Tamti) units. Native units you can recruit as Babylon are being used as garrison troops in Assyria (I haven't even checked Elam) and I don't know why.
Let me look into this.