Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/20150123_DonetskTank_528.jpg
I don't understand the commentators who write everywhere "where did Russian soldiers get such uniforms and equipment"? And what should it be? How are they portrayed in films with AK 47 assault rifles of the year of release?
Russia is considered a leader in electronic suppression means. Now we are still convinced, and in rocket science.
Now a lot of infantry equipment is being produced and developed, for example, full-size anti-shatter suits for stormtroopers.
Helmets and bulletproof vests are also great. I have seen bloggers' reviews several times, where they compared bulletproof vests of the 4th class of protection, where Russian vests lost - the western 4th class of protection is not equal to the Russian, but is equal to the 6th class by our standards.
By the way, any war is a good business. The same Ford factory successfully supplied its engines to Germany in World War II. So think about who is fighting with whom and for what.
Wagner are hiring tank and armor crews, so must be for a reason then.