安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
On the other hand, diplomatic Civs tend to be good against scientific Civs as World Leader votes can begin as soon as anyone enters the information era, and a technological advantage in the late-game gives very little advantage to winning over City-States.
You can also try taking over the Civ's allied City-States. Be sure to start a war with the allied Civ rather than the City-State itself; declaring war directly on too many City-States gives you a penalty to influence gain.
I had this issue in one of my recent games, where I was technologically more advanced than others, and aiming for a Science Victory, but was left helpless to do anything to prevent a Diplomatic Victory by the AI, having allied itself with all CSs. It's way too expensive to bribe CSs enough to overcome an alliance that is in the upper 100s or 200s; and the quests are mostly about luck, and the relationship deteriorates too quickly. It's really such a challenge, especially at higher difficulties.
Cavalry and Tanks make less risky spotters - just move in so the city's in sight, hit it with your siege weapons and move out again.