安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Example of dust: https://ibb.co/gvZn7CJ
Example of an intentional colour change (in this case, Necromancer): https://ibb.co/0KhRfXn
Also, some war paints *intentionally* change the colour of the scope - for example, Necromancer and Business Class make it a satisfying shade of brown. :3
Question: when you are ranking rarest to common, you put that it goes FT > WW > BS. Is there a reason you listed it that way?
I assume it’s because blood splatters are less common on FT. But if that is the case, what about the wear’s rarity itself?
It may be more likely to find blood on the scope on a BS compared to a FT, but there are far more FT skins that exist than BS skins that exist (FT being the most common wear at around 30% and BS being the least common wear at around 8%). Could an argument be made that blood scope rarity is equal regardless of wear? Or maybe that BS or even WW Blood Scopes are rarer than FT?
I suppose since we don’t know the % odds for bloodscopes we can truly never be sure, but I am curious if you have insights to share.
Thanks for making the guide!