Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Example of dust: https://ibb.co/gvZn7CJ
Example of an intentional colour change (in this case, Necromancer): https://ibb.co/0KhRfXn
Also, some war paints *intentionally* change the colour of the scope - for example, Necromancer and Business Class make it a satisfying shade of brown. :3
Question: when you are ranking rarest to common, you put that it goes FT > WW > BS. Is there a reason you listed it that way?
I assume it’s because blood splatters are less common on FT. But if that is the case, what about the wear’s rarity itself?
It may be more likely to find blood on the scope on a BS compared to a FT, but there are far more FT skins that exist than BS skins that exist (FT being the most common wear at around 30% and BS being the least common wear at around 8%). Could an argument be made that blood scope rarity is equal regardless of wear? Or maybe that BS or even WW Blood Scopes are rarer than FT?
I suppose since we don’t know the % odds for bloodscopes we can truly never be sure, but I am curious if you have insights to share.
Thanks for making the guide!