Command: Modern Operations

Command: Modern Operations

Not enough ratings
Defend sovereignty 捍卫主权1997 PLAN VS UK
   
Award
Favorite
Favorited
Unfavorite
Tags: Scenario
File Size
Posted
379.254 KB
Feb 24, 2022 @ 10:53pm
1 Change Note ( view )

Subscribe to download
Defend sovereignty 捍卫主权1997 PLAN VS UK

Description
1840年以来由于中国的封建王朝性质和落后的科技水平致使其惨遭当时世界列强的瓜分,但这在1949年10月1日随着那位伟大的领导人“毛主席”的那一句“中华人民共和国成立了”使得这百年来的屈辱彻底被扫入历史的垃圾桶。中国人民又一次站起来了!但是中国仍没有完全的统一,香港仍被殖民者英国霸占着。随着时间愈发接近租期结束的1997年两个国家的领导人都开始将目光聚集在这个不大的地方。香港:一个繁华的城市,曾被誉为大英帝国皇冠上最后一颗闪耀的明珠。贪婪的英帝国并不想舍弃这一颗“明珠”然而随着帝国的衰微使其已经难以继续维持100多年前那般规模的无敌舰队。此时的帝国已经日薄西山,显然不具备武力维护自身非法既得利益的能力。
但这并没有阻止英国出动武力的决心,在马岛海战的胜利后英国政府忽视了战争背后因胜利被掩盖的问题自认为可以随时复刻一场那样的胜利。1982年英国单方面叫停谈判打算将香港永久性归为己有。这显然是公然挑衅中国的主权,这是中国所不能忍受的!此后中方不断地要求进行谈判,但英国却对此置若罔闻并在国际上积极寻求支持以维护自身的非法利益有意搁置了谈判事宜。时间来到了1996年12月此时中国在深圳部署重兵大量长期缺乏训练的空军与海军部队开始加紧训练外界不断有推测中国此举是打算通过武力维护国家统一与主权完整,1997年1月中方再次要求进行谈判而这一要求不出意料再次遭到拒绝。5月英军集结了几乎所有可以出动的海军组成远征舰队,英国共党力排众议并且不顾海军官员的反对打算发起战争!像100年前那样再次用武力非法摄取维护自身利益。然而对军事一窍不通的英国议会老爷们并没有意识到阿根廷和中国的巨大差距也更加没有意识到英国已经不是100年前的英国而中国也早已不是100年前的中国!6月末英国舰队到达新加坡,此时的中国再次致电英国要求其停止其军事投机行为无视海军士兵的生命以及人权。这一信息被英国错误解读为中方的心虚,反而进一步增强了其发起战争的决心!1997年7月18日做事拖沓的英军抵达南海并摆防空阵型。骄狂自大的英国政府无视了中国政府的最后通牒,并于18日下午对中国不宣而战!袭击了中方负责监视英军的军舰利用鱼雷将其击沉并向海面的幸存水兵开炮射击企图置之于死地!这一行为无疑彻底击穿了中国的底线!中国方面下定决心开战!此前中方已经集结好了部队迅速开进香港击败了脆弱的英军战机与各种地面作战力量迅速进驻香港。21日英军也正式向中国宣战!一场因英国贪婪成性的野心而不可避免的战斗终于——爆发了!
Since 1840, due to the nature of the feudal dynasty and the backward level of science and technology, China has been carved up by the world powers at that time. But on October 1, 1949, with the words "the people's Republic of China was founded" by the great leader "Chairman Mao", the humiliation of the past hundred years was swept into the dustbin of history. The Chinese people stand up again! However, China has not yet been fully reunified, and Hong Kong is still occupied by the British colonists. As time drew closer to the end of the lease, in 1997, the leaders of both countries began to focus on this small place. Hong Kong: a prosperous city, once known as the last shining pearl in the crown of the British Empire. The greedy British Empire did not want to give up this "pearl", but with the decline of the empire, it has been difficult to maintain the size of the invincible fleet of more than 100 years ago. At this time, the empire was in decline, and it was obvious that it did not have the ability to defend its own illegal vested interests by force. But this did not stop Britain from using force. After the victory in the Falklands Sea War, the British government ignored the problem behind the war and thought that it could repeat such a victory at any time. In 1982, Britain unilaterally suspended the negotiations and intended to permanently own Hong Kong. This is obviously a blatant provocation to China's sovereignty, which China cannot bear! Since then, China has repeatedly asked for negotiations, but Britain has turned a deaf ear to this and actively sought international support to safeguard its own illegal interests. When the time came in December 1996, when China deployed a large number of air and naval forces in Shenzhen, which had not been trained for a long time, there was constant speculation that China intended to safeguard national unity and sovereignty by force. In January 1997, China again asked for negotiations, which was unexpectedly rejected again. In May, the British army assembled almost all the available navies to form an expedition fleet, and the British Communist Party fought against public opinion and planned to wage war in spite of the opposition of naval officials! Illegal ingestion by force is used again to protect one's own interests, as it did 100 years ago. However, the lords of the British Parliament, who know nothing about the military, are not aware of the huge gap between Argentina and China, nor do they realize that Britain is no longer the Britain it was 100 years ago and China is not the China it was 100 years ago! When the British fleet arrived in Singapore at the end of June, China called Britain again to ask it to stop its military speculation regardless of the lives and human rights of sailors. This message was misinterpreted by Britain as the guilt of the Chinese side, which further strengthened its determination to start a war. On July 18, 1997, the procrastinating British troops arrived in the South China Sea and set up an air defense formation. The arrogant British government ignored the Chinese government's ultimatum and went to war against China without declaring war on the afternoon of the 18th. Attacked the Chinese warship responsible for monitoring the British army and torpedoed it and fired at the surviving sailors on the sea in an attempt to kill it! This behavior has undoubtedly completely broken through China's bottom line! The Chinese side is determined to go to war! Before that, the Chinese side had assembled its troops and quickly moved into Hong Kong to defeat the fragile British fighter planes and various ground combat forces. On the 21st, the British army also officially declared war on China! A battle inevitable because of Britain's greedy ambition finally broke out!
11 Comments
FKTESK23333  [author] Mar 16, 2022 @ 7:15am 
@19te_Algebraic 那个年代某些公知确实差点把我们忽悠瘸了,没办法,军队当时就说要有人我做的时候也觉得很无奈
19te_Algebraic Mar 13, 2022 @ 4:43pm 
老汉带鱼1确实是惨了点,不过确实是写实。无法想象那年头核潜艇部队是什么战备水平,拖拉机带个烧火棍。
FKTESK23333  [author] Mar 6, 2022 @ 6:34am 
@TRUMP2333 永兴岛91年还是92年就建了机场了
TRUMP2333 Mar 5, 2022 @ 11:10am 
你这剧本怎么南海岛礁还有个机场...那年月我们没能力填岛吧
19te_Algebraic Mar 4, 2022 @ 10:53am 
@adt 345 This is literally not...... What Chinese propaganda wouldn't make the Chinese side awfully powerful? There is no fancy unit in this scenario. If you ever open it, you know. However, if you think "Chinese missile and torpedoes can do their job" is also your definition of "Chinese Propaganda", then go with it.
deutschina Mar 3, 2022 @ 2:00pm 
yeah,now i know how the propaganda of u.s. works......lol thx adt 345
FKTESK23333  [author] Feb 27, 2022 @ 5:23am 
@cristianwj 好家伙看看谁来了!这不是吴谦大校吗(bush)?:steamhappy::steamhappy:
cristianwj Feb 26, 2022 @ 8:27pm 
Why don't you think this game is also a propaganda of US/NATO? LOL
FKTESK23333  [author] Feb 26, 2022 @ 4:03am 
@adt 345 I can assure you it's not,because I am an individual author.:steamhappy::steamhappy:
Rocket Racoon Feb 25, 2022 @ 5:37pm 
Umm.... is this some kind of China/Russia propaganda?