Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Kind of the whole reason why the Huns/Mongols were such an imminent threat... But in many cases from reading the unit descriptions, it seems like the Hun cavalry actually SUCK compared to Ma Teng... So why would anyone even bother keeping this mod after reading the unit combat stats?
A little bit before the Han fell into this 3K period, the Xiongnu collapsed. The main Steppe power above China during the 3K period was the Xianbei, so it would make more sense for this mod faction to be called Xianbei, not Xiongnu.
The Huns were once *part* of the Xiongnu, but they weren't the same ethnically as the Xiongnu ruling class/ dynasty, which makes sense given the Xiongnu was a massive confederation of many tribes. So calling the Huns (if we're referring to Attila's Huns that invaded Europe) "Xiongnu" makes as much sense as calling the French "Romans" or "Gauls".
There are some instances of the Xiongnu being referred to as "Huna" or some other similar term like you described. However, it seems to be a catch-all term used for the Xiongnu but also for tribes after them that invaded Europe, Persia, India, Korea, etc.