Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The trend goes back to Constantine's reforms however. In the East many Goths made up the Palatina Guard however they were switched out for Isuarians and Armenians at 400AD when the Goths rebelled against the ERE.
Franks also settled into Roman territory peacefully, as Foederati. When they attacked Syagrius, they were attacking the enemy of Romulus Augustus, though he had been deposed by Odoacer at that point. The Franks and Goths make for perfectly valid successors to the Empire, as Justinian had sacked and destroyed so much, devastating Roman infrastructure and depopulating Italy during the messy Gothic wars (even destroying the senate), creating some of the first tensions between West and East.
Don't forget the Iconoclast controversy too, further dividing the Churches.