Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Why is the wiki canon?
I'm not saying that the video is, but i'm asking why is the wiki the be all end all?
What is accepted as cannon and official lore is that that is listed and approved in the Wiki database which is primarily where I get most of my reference material. If you go deep into the Lost and Dammed you will see how the MC itself has many reference errors to when it was originally founded. All this is solved by referencing to sourced material from the Wiki pages.
My statement still stands, that that you pointed out, is not cannon. Thats not my opinion, thats what the wiki sources state.
I think it is canon because its published by Rockstar they also have one for TLAD and in the video it shows that the game takes place in 2008 so i mean its Rockstar's word against yours