Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
For starters, this mod and Baptism of the Rus worked fine before and have only recently run into issues. Furthermore, both are highly disputed events in history, with the Baptism of the Rus having more written records of it than the beginning of Rurikid line and general history of early Slavs.
They're also 100+ years apart, so it's not like you can really sub one for the other. Neither this mod or the vanilla experience are necessarily "mainstream history".
To answer your earlier question, there's probably too many cultures that aren't distinct enough to necessitate existing, but did exist at the time in some form, so it's understandable why they're in the mod. The balance is fine, though Rurik is a bit overpowered. However, he doesn't live very long so it balances itself out. It definitely makes playing the Slav rulers more interesting.