Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
None of the cycles felt relevant in themselves beyond the degree to which avoiding the awful two wasted turns of anarchy is more or less hard in the three of them. Oligarchy, despite having the worst bonuses on every level (seriously, -25% science?) is the only one that can actually be actively maintained, as the other two key off of things that the player is already trying to maximize and still have a certain maximum threshold the player can realistically attain, compared to Oligarchy where one can just keep buying workers. It is thus the least awful.
Overall, all of them have Virtue penalties that actively punish the player for building their Civ in a game called Civilization, and thus I am unlikely to boot it back up.