Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
At the opening I had an Any/Any split. This allowed me to parallel process the slower Perceptron sorter.
Triangles went straight into the output stream.
Other shapes went into a decision tree, with Red going to the output and Blue going to the trash.
When I tried this the first time, my solution used another decision tree. I was first sorting on red/green, then red/blue and green/blue. this increased my accuracy to 80%+, but was just a little too slow for gold. I realized only 60% accuracy was necessary, so I could be a little less selective about the colors.
I noted the input contains more blue than green. It seems a decision tree detecting the more frequent color results in greater throughput; this is why I chose a red/blue decision tree. For the curious, beginning with a red/green decision tree results in a throughput of 9.8s. My solution above runs in 8.9s and has a little over 60% accuracy.