Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But since you mentioned it, it's worth noting that this is what a well exposed HDR image looks like, as opposed to the so-called "HDR graphics" of some modern games (like Project Cars) which show white over-exposed skies and very dark foregrounds. That's not "high dynamic range", it's actually HIGH CONTRAST, which is the total opposite of HDR! It simulates the low dynamic range of normal photographs, with the attendent problems of over and under-exposure! If this photo wasn't an HDR image, the rocks in the foreground would be completely black.
I did a monochrome version as well which looked more natural without the excessive blue, but then it lost impact and didn't really look like a night photo anymore. I've obviously reduced the resolution. I haven't looked at the original for a long time. This was taken 10 years ago, early in January 2007.