2
Products
reviewed
38
Products
in account

Recent reviews by wys2007312

Showing 1-2 of 2 entries
13 people found this review helpful
858.7 hrs on record
就新 DLC帝国坟场西藏核心问题:
从历史的角度看,西藏自古以来就是中国不可分割的一部分。早在公元1264年元帝国就已经设置了宣政院来管辖西藏,彼时印度还处于四分五裂的状态;至明王朝设置了“乌斯藏都司”,清王朝则通过中央政府册立班禅,设置驻藏大臣的形式来维护边疆,在这期间印度从未统治过西藏。西藏在中国的历史比苏格兰并入英国的的时间更长,稳定性更强,故对于中国的大多数势力来说拥有西藏的完整核心是合理的,不是沙文主义或极端民族主义。可现在中国却没有一个势力可以获得完整的西藏核心,这是不合理的。若依照麦克马洪线这一帝国主义者为殖民西藏人为创造的伪说,才是真正的帝国主义行径。
若依照在20世纪的民族发明,从雅利安人起源神话的角度认为印度应有西藏核心,更是荒谬的。认为印度人是“雅利安”最早是英国殖民者提出的说法,而英国殖民者为印度人带来了无数的杀戮。若想说印度是“雅利安”,从而合理化给予印度西藏核心,就必须先承认英国殖民印度是正确的,我相信除了仍然相信殖民主义或辉格史观的刽子手屠夫没人会如此想。更何况印欧语系起源于南俄罗斯和乌克兰,和西藏没什么关系。若一定要说正视历史的中国玩家是民族主义的,就请不要从殖民主义者的民族发明出发而充作民族主义受害者。
综上,西藏作为中国不可分割的一部分,在游戏中和现实中都一样。若认为游戏是可以娱乐,可以架空的,那请将创意工坊中关于此次DLC事件被封禁的mod重新上架。

On the core issue of Tibet at the new DLC Empire Cemetery:
From a historical perspective, Tibet has been an inseparable part of China since ancient times. As early as 1264, the Yuan Empire had set up the Propaganda Council to rule Tibet. At that time, India was still divided. By the Ming Dynasty, the "Uzbetan Capital Division" was set up, and the Qing Dynasty maintained its borders in the form of Panchen Lama by the central government and setting up ministers stationed in Tibet. During this period, India never ruled Tibet. Tibet's history in China is longer and more stable than Scotland's integration into Britain, so it is reasonable for most Chinese forces to have the complete core of Tibet, not chauvinism or extreme nationalism. But now China has no force to obtain a complete Tibetan core, which is unreasonable. According to the McMahon Line, an imperialist hypocrisy created for the colonial Tibetans, it is a real imperialist act.
According to the national invention in the 20th century, it is even more absurd to think that India should have the core of Tibet from the perspective of the myth of Aryan origin. The idea that the Indians were "Aryan" was first said by British colonists, who brought countless killings to Indians. If you want to say that India is "Aryan", so as to rationalize the core of Tibet in India, you must first admit that the British colonization of India is correct. I believe no one will think so except the executioner butcher who still believes in colonialism or Whig history. What's more, the Indo-European language family originated in southern Russia and Ukraine, and has nothing to do with Tibet. If it is important to say that Chinese players who face history are nationalist, please do not act as victims of nationalism from the national invention of colonialists.
To sum up, Tibet, as an inalienable part of China, is the same in the game as in reality. If you think the game can be entertaining and overhead, please put the mod in the creative workshop about the banned DLC incident back on the shelves.
若试图隐藏此评论,一周我改一次,直到开发者认识到他们的错误
Posted February 25. Last edited February 25.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
No one has rated this review as helpful yet
89.7 hrs on record (19.3 hrs at review time)
1237
Posted August 8, 2020.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Showing 1-2 of 2 entries