631 people found this review helpful
20 people found this review funny
5
4
18
3
3
13
Not Recommended
0.0 hrs last two weeks / 229.5 hrs on record (100.7 hrs at review time)
Posted: Aug 27, 2017 @ 4:31am
Updated: Sep 2, 2017 @ 6:59am

Edit: My review below is based on v1.2.0.25-R. How much, if any of it applies to future updates... well, I guess we'll see as they happen. I would be a very happy camper if Cleve can fix the issues. I would be even happier if he lifted the very unreasonable ban (see below the review)
-------------------------------

Pros: Great dungeon design, fun, has a nice atmosphere and sense of fantasy.

Cons: You don't have the time to read them, and I don't have the patience to write them all.

Broken combat, broken levelling system, no real progression, itemization is a joke, combat is a joke, and the interface is like someone tried to win an award for how not to design one.

Played Wiz 5-8, MM1-10, Bard's Tale 1 and 2, Ultima blah blah etc etc, so it isn't as if I am a noob to the genre. Clunky is clunky, broken is broken, and promises... well, it took him 20+ years and a dozen or so patches to get us to here, so I am not holding my breath for the game ever to be anything but a 'what could have been'. It is a mishmash of great ideas and poor to horrid implementation.

tldr
An unfinished classic. Cannot recommend, even though I really really would like to.

Edit: A couple of days later...

The dev added me to the long list of people he has banned. I linked back to his own post http://steamcommunity.com/app/650670/discussions/0/1473095331487565310/#c1473095331505987397 where he says that he "doesn't remember" programming a "death date" into NPCs. This link to his own post got me the ban, for (in his words) " You were banned by a Grimoire : Heralds of the Winged Exemplar developer.
Reason: "General purpose troublemaking, undesirable"

Given the buggy nature of this game, and its lack of manual, I think that this behaviour is beyond the pale. Apart from this actual review, I have only made three posts here

http://steamcommunity.com/app/650670/discussions/0/1471967615887955939/#c2579854400738443657
http://steamcommunity.com/app/650670/discussions/0/1471967529573105851/?ctp=44#c2579854400735264252
http://steamcommunity.com/app/650670/discussions/0/1471968797465160274/?ctp=2#c2579854400734564660

and as you can see, none of these could be takne as being "General purpose troublemaking, undesirable"

Essentially, the dev is banning anyone and everyone who in any way points out any flaws in his game, even though in this particular case, all I did was point at the dev's own post.

I basically want the ban to be lifted, since without the ability to ask questions or get support, this game is unplayable in its current state, especially given the lack of a manual.
Was this review helpful? Yes No Funny Award
Developer response:
GOLDEN ERA GAMES  [developer] Posted: Dec 25, 2018 @ 8:08pm
Any game I play for more than ten hours is a good game in my estimate. I have bought games on Steam I got only a few hours of play from and considered them well worth what I paid for them. Somehow you have managed to give a bad review to a game you have invested more than 230 hours into. You have spent another 100 hours trying to convince people it's a bad game. Is it possible you have expectations which nobody can meet? If so, you should have refunded the game instead of playing it for the equivalent of 10 weeks 24 hours a day.
331 Comments
Demiurge Mar 13 @ 10:40pm 
just read this entire thread. I couldn't stop. I don't think I've been so entertained by a review thread before lol. Thanks to all involved for the free entertainment
withersgs Feb 26 @ 11:33am 
This whole thread is wild. It does seem like the original poster did like the game and wanted to recommend it but for some issues. Hopefully going forward they can be further ironed out. However I will say, the combat being a joke and itemization being a joke was rather common back in the day, it's just really weak weapons, clunky fighting and sometimes too high of dmg to the player for modern players to like. Especially towards the beginning of the games, then later they'd become OP powerhouse characters towards the end all geared up.
Ratconned Feb 24 @ 7:14pm 
Horrible stuff. The behaviour of the developer and his pals
LivingVitae Feb 18 @ 4:31am 
Wow, this dev, won't buy because of them, not the reviewer.
Spacemutiny Aug 27, 2023 @ 7:14am 
It is kind of weird that you care this much about a game you clearly hate.
Nagi Jan 6, 2023 @ 4:25am 
I'm dinosaur with laser eyes.
Agenda 2030 Jan 3, 2023 @ 3:05pm 
The dev is a genius, you people have not been privy to see the light, you perhaps have not even glimpsed his LA riots story or the masterpiece tales of why sir tech went bankrupt! No bunker for you!
Sysgen Sep 30, 2022 @ 6:36pm 
This is a ridiculous argument. Logic says the probability of a game showing it's faults are in later stages where development may of been rushed to get the game out the proverbial door.
gunar Sep 30, 2022 @ 1:52pm 
Harhar... got a good laugh out of the trailer alone - what a joke of an UI, or how to get 5 different ugly fonts into one screen - but yeah, the devs responses here are hilarious.
Cheers!
T0nedude May 31, 2022 @ 6:50pm 
Dev sounds like a right bellend.