Cài đặt Steam
đăng nhập
|
ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Hán giản thể)
繁體中文 (Hán phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bungari)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (tiếng Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraine)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật
There's nothing inherently of greater worth in doing so though. You are allowed to want to enjoy yourself and get an in-depth narrative emotional journey
Still, if a game doesn't apparently qualify to make enough of an impression to judge it in 7 hours - that to me is objectively a failure of game design. Hell, it should do so after one or two hours at most!
1. With a collection of over 500 games, it's conceivable that you gravitate towards fast-paced and straightforward gameplay, akin to Half-Life. This preference may have impacted your experience with a more intricate and prolonged narrative like Death Stranding.
2. Given your playtime of approximately 7 hours, it seems likely that you didn't progress far enough in the game to fully grasp its depth. The early stages, including Chapter 2, may have felt like a tutorial, which could contribute to the initial sense of the game being unengaging.
It's unfortunate that your dissatisfaction led to a negative review, potentially influencing others' perceptions of the game. If you find yourself overwhelmed by a multitude of games, I would suggest exploring titles that align more closely with your preferred gameplay experience as to prevent a biased opinion from affecting those who wish to purchase the game.